* ghcHEAD: bump to 8.11.20200403
* ghcHead: reduce diff vs. 8.10.1
dontAddExtraLibs was removed by accident (IMO) in ea19a8ed1e
* ghcHEAD: add ability to use system libffi
- enable nixpkgs' libffi
- minimise diffs against 8.10.1
- remove patching
* remove configure warning about --with-curses-includes
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-curses-includes
44 KiB
title | author | date |
---|---|---|
User's Guide for Haskell in Nixpkgs | Peter Simons | 2015-06-01 |
Haskell
How to install Haskell packages
Nixpkgs distributes build instructions for all Haskell packages registered on Hackage, but strangely enough normal Nix package lookups don't seem to discover any of them, except for the default version of ghc, cabal-install, and stack:
$ nix-env -i alex
error: selector ‘alex’ matches no derivations
$ nix-env -qa ghc
ghc-7.10.2
The Haskell package set is not registered in the top-level namespace because it
is huge. If all Haskell packages were visible to these commands, then
name-based search/install operations would be much slower than they are now. We
avoided that by keeping all Haskell-related packages in a separate attribute
set called haskellPackages
, which the following command will list:
$ nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -qaP -A haskellPackages
haskellPackages.a50 a50-0.5
haskellPackages.AAI AAI-0.2.0.1
haskellPackages.abacate abacate-0.0.0.0
haskellPackages.abc-puzzle abc-puzzle-0.2.1
haskellPackages.abcBridge abcBridge-0.15
haskellPackages.abcnotation abcnotation-1.9.0
haskellPackages.abeson abeson-0.1.0.1
[... some 14000 entries omitted ...]
To install any of those packages into your profile, refer to them by their attribute path (first column):
nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -iA haskellPackages.Allure ...
The attribute path of any Haskell packages corresponds to the name of that
particular package on Hackage: the package cabal-install
has the attribute
haskellPackages.cabal-install
, and so on. (Actually, this convention causes
trouble with packages like 3dmodels
and 4Blocks
, because these names are
invalid identifiers in the Nix language. The issue of how to deal with these
rare corner cases is currently unresolved.)
Haskell packages whose Nix name (second column) begins with a haskell-
prefix
are packages that provide a library whereas packages without that prefix
provide just executables. Libraries may provide executables too, though: the
package haskell-pandoc
, for example, installs both a library and an
application. You can install and use Haskell executables just like any other
program in Nixpkgs, but using Haskell libraries for development is a bit
trickier and we'll address that subject in great detail in section How to
create a development environment.
Attribute paths are deterministic inside of Nixpkgs, but the path necessary to
reach Nixpkgs varies from system to system. We dodged that problem by giving
nix-env
an explicit -f "<nixpkgs>"
parameter, but if you call nix-env
without that flag, then chances are the invocation fails:
$ nix-env -iA haskellPackages.cabal-install
error: attribute ‘haskellPackages’ in selection path
‘haskellPackages.cabal-install’ not found
On NixOS, for example, Nixpkgs does not exist in the top-level namespace by default. To figure out the proper attribute path, it's easiest to query for the path of a well-known Nixpkgs package, i.e.:
$ nix-env -qaP coreutils
nixos.coreutils coreutils-8.23
If your system responds like that (most NixOS installations will), then the
attribute path to haskellPackages
is nixos.haskellPackages
. Thus, if you
want to use nix-env
without giving an explicit -f
flag, then that's the way
to do it:
nix-env -qaP -A nixos.haskellPackages
nix-env -iA nixos.haskellPackages.cabal-install
Our current default compiler is GHC 8.8.x and the haskellPackages
set
contains packages built with that particular version. Nixpkgs contains the last
three major releases of GHC and there is a whole family of package sets
available that defines Hackage packages built with each of those compilers,
too:
nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -qaP -A haskell.packages.ghc865
nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -qaP -A haskell.packages.ghc8101
The name haskellPackages
is really just a synonym for
haskell.packages.ghc882
, because we prefer that package set internally and
recommend it to our users as their default choice, but ultimately you are free
to compile your Haskell packages with any GHC version you please. The following
command displays the complete list of available compilers:
$ nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -qaP -A haskell.compiler
haskell.compiler.ghc8101 ghc-8.10.1
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc8101 ghc-8.10.1
haskell.compiler.ghcHEAD ghc-8.11.20200403
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghcHEAD ghc-8.11.20200403
haskell.compiler.ghc822Binary ghc-8.2.2-binary
haskell.compiler.ghc844 ghc-8.4.4
haskell.compiler.ghc863Binary ghc-8.6.3-binary
haskell.compiler.ghc865 ghc-8.6.5
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc865 ghc-8.6.5
haskell.compiler.ghc881 ghc-8.8.1
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc881 ghc-8.8.1
haskell.compiler.ghc882 ghc-8.8.2
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc882 ghc-8.8.2
haskell.compiler.ghc883 ghc-8.8.3
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc883 ghc-8.8.3
haskell.compiler.ghcjs ghcjs-8.6.0.1
We have no package sets for jhc
or uhc
yet, unfortunately, but for every
version of GHC listed above, there exists a package set based on that compiler.
Also, the attributes haskell.compiler.ghcXYC
and
haskell.packages.ghcXYC.ghc
are synonymous for the sake of convenience.
How to create a development environment
How to install a compiler
A simple development environment consists of a Haskell compiler and one or both
of the tools cabal-install
and stack
. We saw in section
How to install Haskell packages how you can install those programs into your
user profile:
nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -iA haskellPackages.ghc haskellPackages.cabal-install
Instead of the default package set haskellPackages
, you can also use the more
precise name haskell.compiler.ghc7102
, which has the advantage that it refers
to the same GHC version regardless of what Nixpkgs considers "default" at any
given time.
Once you've made those tools available in $PATH
, it's possible to build
Hackage packages the same way people without access to Nix do it all the time:
cabal get lens-4.11 && cd lens-4.11
cabal install -j --dependencies-only
cabal configure
cabal build
If you enjoy working with Cabal sandboxes, then that's entirely possible too: just execute the command
cabal sandbox init
before installing the required dependencies.
The nix-shell
utility makes it easy to switch to a different compiler
version; just enter the Nix shell environment with the command
nix-shell -p haskell.compiler.ghc784
to bring GHC 7.8.4 into $PATH
. Alternatively, you can use Stack instead of
nix-shell
directly to select compiler versions and other build tools
per-project. It uses nix-shell
under the hood when Nix support is turned on.
See How to build a Haskell project using Stack.
If you're using cabal-install
, re-running cabal configure
inside the spawned
shell switches your build to use that compiler instead. If you're working on
a project that doesn't depend on any additional system libraries outside of GHC,
then it's even sufficient to just run the cabal configure
command inside of
the shell:
nix-shell -p haskell.compiler.ghc784 --command "cabal configure"
Afterwards, all other commands like cabal build
work just fine in any shell
environment, because the configure phase recorded the absolute paths to all
required tools like GHC in its build configuration inside of the dist/
directory. Please note, however, that nix-collect-garbage
can break such an
environment because the Nix store paths created by nix-shell
aren't "alive"
anymore once nix-shell
has terminated. If you find that your Haskell builds
no longer work after garbage collection, then you'll have to re-run cabal configure
inside of a new nix-shell
environment.
How to install a compiler with libraries
GHC expects to find all installed libraries inside of its own lib
directory.
This approach works fine on traditional Unix systems, but it doesn't work for
Nix, because GHC's store path is immutable once it's built. We cannot install
additional libraries into that location. As a consequence, our copies of GHC
don't know any packages except their own core libraries, like base
,
containers
, Cabal
, etc.
We can register additional libraries to GHC, however, using a special build
function called ghcWithPackages
. That function expects one argument: a
function that maps from an attribute set of Haskell packages to a list of
packages, which determines the libraries known to that particular version of
GHC. For example, the Nix expression ghcWithPackages (pkgs: [pkgs.mtl])
generates a copy of GHC that has the mtl
library registered in addition to
its normal core packages:
$ nix-shell -p "haskellPackages.ghcWithPackages (pkgs: [pkgs.mtl])"
[nix-shell:~]$ ghc-pkg list mtl
/nix/store/zy79...-ghc-7.10.2/lib/ghc-7.10.2/package.conf.d:
mtl-2.2.1
This function allows users to define their own development environment by means
of an override. After adding the following snippet to ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix
,
{
packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in
{
myHaskellEnv = self.haskell.packages.ghc7102.ghcWithPackages
(haskellPackages: with haskellPackages; [
# libraries
arrows async cgi criterion
# tools
cabal-install haskintex
]);
};
}
it's possible to install that compiler with nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -iA myHaskellEnv
. If you'd like to switch that development environment to a
different version of GHC, just replace the ghc7102
bit in the previous
definition with the appropriate name. Of course, it's also possible to define
any number of these development environments! (You can't install two of them
into the same profile at the same time, though, because that would result in
file conflicts.)
The generated ghc
program is a wrapper script that re-directs the real
GHC executable to use a new lib
directory --- one that we specifically
constructed to contain all those packages the user requested:
$ cat $(type -p ghc)
#! /nix/store/xlxj...-bash-4.3-p33/bin/bash -e
export NIX_GHC=/nix/store/19sm...-ghc-7.10.2/bin/ghc
export NIX_GHCPKG=/nix/store/19sm...-ghc-7.10.2/bin/ghc-pkg
export NIX_GHC_DOCDIR=/nix/store/19sm...-ghc-7.10.2/share/doc/ghc/html
export NIX_GHC_LIBDIR=/nix/store/19sm...-ghc-7.10.2/lib/ghc-7.10.2
exec /nix/store/j50p...-ghc-7.10.2/bin/ghc "-B$NIX_GHC_LIBDIR" "$@"
The variables $NIX_GHC
, $NIX_GHCPKG
, etc. point to the new store path
ghcWithPackages
constructed specifically for this environment. The last line
of the wrapper script then executes the real ghc
, but passes the path to the
new lib
directory using GHC's -B
flag.
The purpose of those environment variables is to work around an impurity in the
popular ghc-paths library. That
library promises to give its users access to GHC's installation paths. Only,
the library can't possible know that path when it's compiled, because the path
GHC considers its own is determined only much later, when the user configures
it through ghcWithPackages
. So we patched
ghc-paths
to return the paths found in those environment variables at run-time rather
than trying to guess them at compile-time.
To make sure that mechanism works properly all the time, we recommend that you
set those variables to meaningful values in your shell environment, too, i.e.
by adding the following code to your ~/.bashrc
:
if type >/dev/null 2>&1 -p ghc; then
eval "$(egrep ^export "$(type -p ghc)")"
fi
If you are certain that you'll use only one GHC environment which is located in
your user profile, then you can use the following code, too, which has the
advantage that it doesn't contain any paths from the Nix store, i.e. those
settings always remain valid even if a nix-env -u
operation updates the GHC
environment in your profile:
if [ -e ~/.nix-profile/bin/ghc ]; then
export NIX_GHC="$HOME/.nix-profile/bin/ghc"
export NIX_GHCPKG="$HOME/.nix-profile/bin/ghc-pkg"
export NIX_GHC_DOCDIR="$HOME/.nix-profile/share/doc/ghc/html"
export NIX_GHC_LIBDIR="$HOME/.nix-profile/lib/ghc-$($NIX_GHC --numeric-version)"
fi
How to install a compiler with libraries, hoogle and documentation indexes
If you plan to use your environment for interactive programming, not just
compiling random Haskell code, you might want to replace ghcWithPackages
in
all the listings above with ghcWithHoogle
.
This environment generator not only produces an environment with GHC and all
the specified libraries, but also generates a hoogle
and haddock
indexes
for all the packages, and provides a wrapper script around hoogle
binary that
uses all those things. A precise name for this thing would be
"ghcWithPackagesAndHoogleAndDocumentationIndexes
", which is, regrettably, too
long and scary.
For example, installing the following environment
{
packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in
{
myHaskellEnv = self.haskellPackages.ghcWithHoogle
(haskellPackages: with haskellPackages; [
# libraries
arrows async cgi criterion
# tools
cabal-install haskintex
]);
};
}
allows one to browse module documentation index not too dissimilar to
this
for all the specified packages and their dependencies by directing a browser of
choice to ~/.nix-profile/share/doc/hoogle/index.html
(or
/run/current-system/sw/share/doc/hoogle/index.html
in case you put it in
environment.systemPackages
in NixOS).
After you've marveled enough at that try adding the following to your
~/.ghc/ghci.conf
:def hoogle \s -> return $ ":! hoogle search -cl --count=15 \"" ++ s ++ "\""
:def doc \s -> return $ ":! hoogle search -cl --info \"" ++ s ++ "\""
and test it by typing into ghci
:
:hoogle a -> a
:doc a -> a
Be sure to note the links to haddock
files in the output. With any modern and
properly configured terminal emulator you can just click those links to
navigate there.
Finally, you can run
hoogle server --local -p 8080
and navigate to http://localhost:8080/ for your own local
Hoogle. The --local
flag makes the hoogle
server serve files from your nix store over http, without the flag it will use
file://
URIs. Note, however, that Firefox and possibly other browsers
disallow navigation from http://
to file://
URIs for security reasons,
which might be quite an inconvenience. Versions before v5 did not have this
flag. See
this page for
workarounds.
For NixOS users there's a service which runs this exact command for you.
Specify the packages
you want documentation for and the haskellPackages
set
you want them to come from. Add the following to configuration.nix
.
services.hoogle = {
enable = true;
packages = (hpkgs: with hpkgs; [text cryptonite]);
haskellPackages = pkgs.haskellPackages;
};
How to build a Haskell project using Stack
Stack is a popular build tool for Haskell projects.
It has first-class support for Nix. Stack can optionally use Nix to
automatically select the right version of GHC and other build tools to build,
test and execute apps in an existing project downloaded from somewhere on the
Internet. Pass the --nix
flag to any stack
command to do so, e.g.
git clone --recurse-submodules https://github.com/yesodweb/wai.git
cd wai
stack --nix build
If you want stack
to use Nix by default, you can add a nix
section to the
stack.yaml
file, as explained in the Stack documentation. For
example:
nix:
enable: true
packages: [pkgconfig zeromq zlib]
The example configuration snippet above tells Stack to create an ad hoc
environment for nix-shell
as in the below section, in which the pkgconfig
,
zeromq
and zlib
packages from Nixpkgs are available. All stack
commands
will implicitly be executed inside this ad hoc environment.
Some projects have more sophisticated needs. For examples, some ad hoc
environments might need to expose Nixpkgs packages compiled in a certain way, or
with extra environment variables. In these cases, you'll need a shell
field
instead of packages
:
nix:
enable: true
shell-file: shell.nix
For more on how to write a shell.nix
file see the below section. You'll need
to express a derivation. Note that Nixpkgs ships with a convenience wrapper
function around mkDerivation
called haskell.lib.buildStackProject
to help you
create this derivation in exactly the way Stack expects. However for this to work
you need to disable the sandbox, which you can do by using --option sandbox relaxed
or --option sandbox false
to the Nix command. All of the same inputs
as mkDerivation
can be provided. For example, to build a Stack project that
including packages that link against a version of the R library compiled with
special options turned on:
with (import <nixpkgs> { });
let R = pkgs.R.override { enableStrictBarrier = true; };
in
haskell.lib.buildStackProject {
name = "HaskellR";
buildInputs = [ R zeromq zlib ];
}
You can select a particular GHC version to compile with by setting the
ghc
attribute as an argument to buildStackProject
. Better yet, let
Stack choose what GHC version it wants based on the snapshot specified
in stack.yaml
(only works with Stack >= 1.1.3):
{nixpkgs ? import <nixpkgs> { }, ghc ? nixpkgs.ghc}:
with nixpkgs;
let R = pkgs.R.override { enableStrictBarrier = true; };
in
haskell.lib.buildStackProject {
name = "HaskellR";
buildInputs = [ R zeromq zlib ];
inherit ghc;
}
How to create ad hoc environments for nix-shell
The easiest way to create an ad hoc development environment is to run
nix-shell
with the appropriate GHC environment given on the command-line:
nix-shell -p "haskellPackages.ghcWithPackages (pkgs: with pkgs; [mtl pandoc])"
For more sophisticated use-cases, however, it's more convenient to save the
desired configuration in a file called shell.nix
that looks like this:
{ nixpkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {}, compiler ? "ghc7102" }:
let
inherit (nixpkgs) pkgs;
ghc = pkgs.haskell.packages.${compiler}.ghcWithPackages (ps: with ps; [
monad-par mtl
]);
in
pkgs.stdenv.mkDerivation {
name = "my-haskell-env-0";
buildInputs = [ ghc ];
shellHook = "eval $(egrep ^export ${ghc}/bin/ghc)";
}
Now run nix-shell
--- or even nix-shell --pure
--- to enter a shell
environment that has the appropriate compiler in $PATH
. If you use --pure
,
then add all other packages that your development environment needs into the
buildInputs
attribute. If you'd like to switch to a different compiler
version, then pass an appropriate compiler
argument to the expression, i.e.
nix-shell --argstr compiler ghc784
.
If you need such an environment because you'd like to compile a Hackage package
outside of Nix --- i.e. because you're hacking on the latest version from Git
---, then the package set provides suitable nix-shell environments for you
already! Every Haskell package has an env
attribute that provides a shell
environment suitable for compiling that particular package. If you'd like to
hack the lens
library, for example, then you just have to check out the
source code and enter the appropriate environment:
$ cabal get lens-4.11 && cd lens-4.11
Downloading lens-4.11...
Unpacking to lens-4.11/
$ nix-shell "<nixpkgs>" -A haskellPackages.lens.env
[nix-shell:/tmp/lens-4.11]$
At point, you can run cabal configure
, cabal build
, and all the other
development commands. Note that you need cabal-install
installed in your
$PATH
already to use it here --- the nix-shell
environment does not provide
it.
How to create Nix builds for your own private Haskell packages
If your own Haskell packages have build instructions for Cabal, then you can
convert those automatically into build instructions for Nix using the
cabal2nix
utility, which you can install into your profile by running
nix-env -i cabal2nix
.
How to build a stand-alone project
For example, let's assume that you're working on a private project called
foo
. To generate a Nix build expression for it, change into the project's
top-level directory and run the command:
cabal2nix . > foo.nix
Then write the following snippet into a file called default.nix
:
{ nixpkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {}, compiler ? "ghc7102" }:
nixpkgs.pkgs.haskell.packages.${compiler}.callPackage ./foo.nix { }
Finally, store the following code in a file called shell.nix
:
{ nixpkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {}, compiler ? "ghc7102" }:
(import ./default.nix { inherit nixpkgs compiler; }).env
At this point, you can run nix-build
to have Nix compile your project and
install it into a Nix store path. The local directory will contain a symlink
called result
after nix-build
returns that points into that location. Of
course, passing the flag --argstr compiler ghc763
allows switching the build
to any version of GHC currently supported.
Furthermore, you can call nix-shell
to enter an interactive development
environment in which you can use cabal configure
and cabal build
to develop
your code. That environment will automatically contain a proper GHC derivation
with all the required libraries registered as well as all the system-level
libraries your package might need.
If your package does not depend on any system-level libraries, then it's sufficient to run
nix-shell --command "cabal configure"
once to set up your build. cabal-install
determines the absolute paths to all
resources required for the build and writes them into a config file in the
dist/
directory. Once that's done, you can run cabal build
and any other
command for that project even outside of the nix-shell
environment. This
feature is particularly nice for those of us who like to edit their code with
an IDE, like Emacs' haskell-mode
, because it's not necessary to start Emacs
inside of nix-shell just to make it find out the necessary settings for
building the project; cabal-install
has already done that for us.
If you want to do some quick-and-dirty hacking and don't want to bother setting
up a default.nix
and shell.nix
file manually, then you can use the
--shell
flag offered by cabal2nix
to have it generate a stand-alone
nix-shell
environment for you. With that feature, running
cabal2nix --shell . > shell.nix
nix-shell --command "cabal configure"
is usually enough to set up a build environment for any given Haskell package.
You can even use that generated file to run nix-build
, too:
nix-build shell.nix
How to build projects that depend on each other
If you have multiple private Haskell packages that depend on each other, then
you'll have to register those packages in the Nixpkgs set to make them visible
for the dependency resolution performed by callPackage
. First of all, change
into each of your projects top-level directories and generate a default.nix
file with cabal2nix
:
cd ~/src/foo && cabal2nix . > default.nix
cd ~/src/bar && cabal2nix . > default.nix
Then edit your ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix
file to register those builds in the
default Haskell package set:
{
packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in
{
haskellPackages = super.haskellPackages.override {
overrides = self: super: {
foo = self.callPackage ../src/foo {};
bar = self.callPackage ../src/bar {};
};
};
};
}
Once that's accomplished, nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -qA haskellPackages
will
show your packages like any other package from Hackage, and you can build them
nix-build "<nixpkgs>" -A haskellPackages.foo
or enter an interactive shell environment suitable for building them:
nix-shell "<nixpkgs>" -A haskellPackages.bar.env
Miscellaneous Topics
How to build with profiling enabled
Every Haskell package set takes a function called overrides
that you can use
to manipulate the package as much as you please. One useful application of this
feature is to replace the default mkDerivation
function with one that enables
library profiling for all packages. To accomplish that add the following
snippet to your ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix
file:
{
packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in
{
profiledHaskellPackages = self.haskellPackages.override {
overrides = self: super: {
mkDerivation = args: super.mkDerivation (args // {
enableLibraryProfiling = true;
});
};
};
};
}
Then, replace instances of haskellPackages
in the cabal2nix
-generated
default.nix
or shell.nix
files with profiledHaskellPackages
.
How to override package versions in a compiler-specific package set
Nixpkgs provides the latest version of
ghc-events
, which is 0.4.4.0
at the time of this writing. This is fine for users of GHC 7.10.x, but GHC
7.8.4 cannot compile that binary. Now, one way to solve that problem is to
register an older version of ghc-events
in the 7.8.x-specific package set.
The first step is to generate Nix build instructions with cabal2nix
:
cabal2nix cabal://ghc-events-0.4.3.0 > ~/.nixpkgs/ghc-events-0.4.3.0.nix
Then add the override in ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix
:
{
packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in
{
haskell = super.haskell // {
packages = super.haskell.packages // {
ghc784 = super.haskell.packages.ghc784.override {
overrides = self: super: {
ghc-events = self.callPackage ./ghc-events-0.4.3.0.nix {};
};
};
};
};
};
}
This code is a little crazy, no doubt, but it's necessary because the intuitive version
{ # ...
haskell.packages.ghc784 = super.haskell.packages.ghc784.override {
overrides = self: super: {
ghc-events = self.callPackage ./ghc-events-0.4.3.0.nix {};
};
};
}
doesn't do what we want it to: that code replaces the haskell
package set in
Nixpkgs with one that contains only one entry,packages
, which contains only
one entry ghc784
. This override loses the haskell.compiler
set, and it
loses the haskell.packages.ghcXYZ
sets for all compilers but GHC 7.8.4. To
avoid that problem, we have to perform the convoluted little dance from above,
iterating over each step in hierarchy.
Once it's accomplished, however, we can install a variant of ghc-events
that's compiled with GHC 7.8.4:
nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -iA haskell.packages.ghc784.ghc-events
Unfortunately, it turns out that this build fails again while executing the
test suite! Apparently, the release archive on Hackage is missing some data
files that the test suite requires, so we cannot run it. We accomplish that by
re-generating the Nix expression with the --no-check
flag:
cabal2nix --no-check cabal://ghc-events-0.4.3.0 > ~/.nixpkgs/ghc-events-0.4.3.0.nix
Now the builds succeeds.
Of course, in the concrete example of ghc-events
this whole exercise is not
an ideal solution, because ghc-events
can analyze the output emitted by any
version of GHC later than 6.12 regardless of the compiler version that was used
to build the ghc-events
executable, so strictly speaking there's no reason to
prefer one built with GHC 7.8.x in the first place. However, for users who
cannot use GHC 7.10.x at all for some reason, the approach of downgrading to an
older version might be useful.
How to override packages in all compiler-specific package sets
In the previous section we learned how to override a package in a single compiler-specific package set. You may have some overrides defined that you want to use across multiple package sets. To accomplish this you could use the technique that we learned in the previous section by repeating the overrides for all the compiler-specific package sets. For example:
{
packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in
{
haskell = super.haskell // {
packages = super.haskell.packages // {
ghc784 = super.haskell.packages.ghc784.override {
overrides = self: super: {
my-package = ...;
my-other-package = ...;
};
};
ghc822 = super.haskell.packages.ghc784.override {
overrides = self: super: {
my-package = ...;
my-other-package = ...;
};
};
...
};
};
};
}
However there's a more convenient way to override all compiler-specific package sets at once:
{
packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in
{
haskell = super.haskell // {
packageOverrides = self: super: {
my-package = ...;
my-other-package = ...;
};
};
};
}
How to specify source overrides for your Haskell package
When starting a Haskell project you can use developPackage
to define a derivation for your package at the root
path
as well as source override versions for Hackage packages, like so:
# default.nix
{ compilerVersion ? "ghc842" }:
let
# pinning nixpkgs using new Nix 2.0 builtin `fetchGit`
pkgs = import (fetchGit (import ./version.nix)) { };
compiler = pkgs.haskell.packages."${compilerVersion}";
pkg = compiler.developPackage {
root = ./.;
source-overrides = {
# Let's say the GHC 8.4.2 haskellPackages uses 1.6.0.0 and your test suite is incompatible with >= 1.6.0.0
HUnit = "1.5.0.0";
};
};
in pkg
This could be used in place of a simplified stack.yaml
defining a Nix
derivation for your Haskell package.
As you can see this allows you to specify only the source version found on Hackage and nixpkgs will take care of the rest.
You can also specify buildInputs
for your Haskell derivation for packages
that directly depend on external libraries like so:
# default.nix
{ compilerVersion ? "ghc842" }:
let
# pinning nixpkgs using new Nix 2.0 builtin `fetchGit`
pkgs = import (fetchGit (import ./version.nix)) { };
compiler = pkgs.haskell.packages."${compilerVersion}";
pkg = compiler.developPackage {
root = ./.;
source-overrides = {
HUnit = "1.5.0.0"; # Let's say the GHC 8.4.2 haskellPackages uses 1.6.0.0 and your test suite is incompatible with >= 1.6.0.0
};
};
# in case your package source depends on any libraries directly, not just transitively.
buildInputs = [ zlib ];
in pkg.overrideAttrs(attrs: {
buildInputs = attrs.buildInputs ++ buildInputs;
})
Notice that you will need to override (via overrideAttrs
or similar) the
derivation returned by the developPackage
Nix lambda as there is no buildInputs
named argument you can pass directly into the developPackage
lambda.
How to recover from GHC's infamous non-deterministic library ID bug
GHC and distributed build farms don't get along well:
When you see an error like this one
package foo-0.7.1.0 is broken due to missing package
text-1.2.0.4-98506efb1b9ada233bb5c2b2db516d91
then you have to download and re-install foo
and all its dependents from
scratch:
nix-store -q --referrers /nix/store/*-haskell-text-1.2.0.4 \
| xargs -L 1 nix-store --repair-path
If you're using additional Hydra servers other than hydra.nixos.org
, then it
might be necessary to purge the local caches that store data from those
machines to disable these binary channels for the duration of the previous
command, i.e. by running:
rm ~/.cache/nix/binary-cache*.sqlite
Builds on Darwin fail with math.h
not found
Users of GHC on Darwin have occasionally reported that builds fail, because the compiler complains about a missing include file:
fatal error: 'math.h' file not found
The issue has been discussed at length in ticket 6390, and so far no good solution has been proposed. As a work-around, users who run into this problem can configure the environment variables
export NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE="-idirafter /usr/include"
export NIX_CFLAGS_LINK="-L/usr/lib"
in their ~/.bashrc
file to avoid the compiler error.
Builds using Stack complain about missing system libraries
-- While building package zlib-0.5.4.2 using:
runhaskell -package=Cabal-1.22.4.0 -clear-package-db [... lots of flags ...]
Process exited with code: ExitFailure 1
Logs have been written to: /home/foo/src/stack-ide/.stack-work/logs/zlib-0.5.4.2.log
Configuring zlib-0.5.4.2...
Setup.hs: Missing dependency on a foreign library:
* Missing (or bad) header file: zlib.h
This problem can usually be solved by installing the system package that
provides this library (you may need the "-dev" version). If the library is
already installed but in a non-standard location then you can use the flags
--extra-include-dirs= and --extra-lib-dirs= to specify where it is.
If the header file does exist, it may contain errors that are caught by the C
compiler at the preprocessing stage. In this case you can re-run configure
with the verbosity flag -v3 to see the error messages.
When you run the build inside of the nix-shell environment, the system
is configured to find libz.so
without any special flags -- the compiler
and linker "just know" how to find it. Consequently, Cabal won't record
any search paths for libz.so
in the package description, which means
that the package works fine inside of nix-shell, but once you leave the
shell the shared object can no longer be found. That issue is by no
means specific to Stack: you'll have that problem with any other
Haskell package that's built inside of nix-shell but run outside of that
environment.
You can remedy this issue in several ways. The easiest is to add a nix
section
to the stack.yaml
like the following:
nix:
enable: true
packages: [ zlib ]
Stack's Nix support knows to add ${zlib.out}/lib
and ${zlib.dev}/include
as an --extra-lib-dirs
and extra-include-dirs
, respectively.
Alternatively, you can achieve the same effect by hand. First of all, run
$ nix-build --no-out-link "<nixpkgs>" -A zlib
/nix/store/alsvwzkiw4b7ip38l4nlfjijdvg3fvzn-zlib-1.2.8
to find out the store path of the system's zlib library. Now, you can
-
add that path (plus a "/lib" suffix) to your
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
environment variable to make sure your system linker findslibz.so
automatically. It's no pretty solution, but it will work. -
As a variant of (1), you can also install any number of system libraries into your user's profile (or some other profile) and point
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
to that profile instead, so that you don't have to list dozens of those store paths all over the place. -
The solution I prefer is to call stack with an appropriate --extra-lib-dirs flag like so:
shell stack --extra-lib-dirs=/nix/store/alsvwzkiw4b7ip38l4nlfjijdvg3fvzn-zlib-1.2.8/lib build
Typically, you'll need --extra-include-dirs
as well. It's possible
to add those flag to the project's stack.yaml
or your user's
global ~/.stack/global/stack.yaml
file so that you don't have to
specify them manually every time. But again, you're likely better off
using Stack's Nix support instead.
The same thing applies to cabal configure
, of course, if you're
building with cabal-install
instead of Stack.
Creating statically linked binaries
There are two levels of static linking. The first option is to configure the
build with the Cabal flag --disable-executable-dynamic
. In Nix expressions,
this can be achieved by setting the attribute:
enableSharedExecutables = false;
That gives you a binary with statically linked Haskell libraries and dynamically linked system libraries.
To link both Haskell libraries and system libraries statically, the additional
flags --ghc-option=-optl=-static --ghc-option=-optl=-pthread
need to be used.
In Nix, this is accomplished with:
configureFlags = [ "--ghc-option=-optl=-static" "--ghc-option=-optl=-pthread" ];
It's important to realize, however, that most system libraries in Nix are built as shared libraries only, i.e. there is just no static library available that Cabal could link!
Building GHC with integer-simple
By default GHC implements the Integer type using the GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic (GMP) library. The implementation can be found in the integer-gmp package.
A potential problem with this is that GMP is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), a kind of "copyleft" license. According to the terms of the LGPL, paragraph 5, you may distribute a program that is designed to be compiled and dynamically linked with the library under the terms of your choice (i.e., commercially) but if your program incorporates portions of the library, if it is linked statically, then your program is a "derivative"--a "work based on the library"--and according to paragraph 2, section c, you "must cause the whole of the work to be licensed" under the terms of the LGPL (including for free).
The LGPL licensing for GMP is a problem for the overall licensing of binary programs compiled with GHC because most distributions (and builds) of GHC use static libraries. (Dynamic libraries are currently distributed only for macOS.) The LGPL licensing situation may be worse: even though The Glasgow Haskell Compiler License is essentially a "free software" license (BSD3), according to paragraph 2 of the LGPL, GHC must be distributed under the terms of the LGPL!
To work around these problems GHC can be build with a slower but LGPL-free alternative implementation for Integer called integer-simple.
To get a GHC compiler build with integer-simple
instead of integer-gmp
use
the attribute: haskell.compiler.integer-simple."${ghcVersion}"
.
For example:
$ nix-build -E '(import <nixpkgs> {}).haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc802'
...
$ result/bin/ghc-pkg list | grep integer
integer-simple-0.1.1.1
The following command displays the complete list of GHC compilers build with integer-simple
:
$ nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -qaP -A haskell.compiler.integer-simple
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc7102 ghc-7.10.2
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc7103 ghc-7.10.3
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc722 ghc-7.2.2
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc742 ghc-7.4.2
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc783 ghc-7.8.3
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc784 ghc-7.8.4
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc801 ghc-8.0.1
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghc802 ghc-8.0.2
haskell.compiler.integer-simple.ghcHEAD ghc-8.1.20170106
To get a package set supporting integer-simple
use the attribute:
haskell.packages.integer-simple."${ghcVersion}"
. For example
use the following to get the scientific
package build with integer-simple
:
nix-build -A haskell.packages.integer-simple.ghc802.scientific
Quality assurance
The haskell.lib
library includes a number of functions for checking for
various imperfections in Haskell packages. It's useful to apply these functions
to your own Haskell packages and integrate that in a Continuous Integration
server like hydra to assure your packages maintain a
minimum level of quality. This section discusses some of these functions.
failOnAllWarnings
Applying haskell.lib.failOnAllWarnings
to a Haskell package enables the
-Wall
and -Werror
GHC options to turn all warnings into build failures.
buildStrictly
Applying haskell.lib.buildStrictly
to a Haskell package calls
failOnAllWarnings
on the given package to turn all warnings into build
failures. Additionally the source of your package is gotten from first invoking
cabal sdist
to ensure all needed files are listed in the Cabal file.
checkUnusedPackages
Applying haskell.lib.checkUnusedPackages
to a Haskell package invokes
the packunused tool on the
package. packunused
complains when it finds packages listed as build-depends
in the Cabal file which are redundant. For example:
$ nix-build -E 'let pkgs = import <nixpkgs> {}; in pkgs.haskell.lib.checkUnusedPackages {} pkgs.haskellPackages.scientific'
these derivations will be built:
/nix/store/3lc51cxj2j57y3zfpq5i69qbzjpvyci1-scientific-0.3.5.1.drv
...
detected package components
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- library
- testsuite(s): test-scientific
- benchmark(s): bench-scientific*
(component names suffixed with '*' are not configured to be built)
library
~~~~~~~
The following package dependencies seem redundant:
- ghc-prim-0.5.0.0
testsuite(test-scientific)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
no redundant packages dependencies found
builder for ‘/nix/store/3lc51cxj2j57y3zfpq5i69qbzjpvyci1-scientific-0.3.5.1.drv’ failed with exit code 1
error: build of ‘/nix/store/3lc51cxj2j57y3zfpq5i69qbzjpvyci1-scientific-0.3.5.1.drv’ failed
As you can see, packunused
finds out that although the testsuite component has
no redundant dependencies the library component of scientific-0.3.5.1
depends
on ghc-prim
which is unused in the library.
Using hackage2nix with nixpkgs
Hackage package derivations are found in the
hackage-packages.nix
file within nixpkgs
and are used as the initial package set for
haskellPackages
. The hackage-packages.nix
file is not meant to be edited
by hand, but rather autogenerated by hackage2nix
,
which by default uses the configuration-hackage2nix.yaml
file to generate all the derivations.
To modify the contents configuration-hackage2nix.yaml
, follow the
instructions on hackage2nix
.
Other resources
-
The Youtube video Nix Loves Haskell provides an introduction into Haskell NG aimed at beginners. The slides are available at http://cryp.to/nixos-meetup-3-slides.pdf and also -- in a form ready for cut & paste -- at https://github.com/NixOS/cabal2nix/blob/master/doc/nixos-meetup-3-slides.md.
-
Another Youtube video is Escaping Cabal Hell with Nix, which discusses the subject of Haskell development with Nix but also provides a basic introduction to Nix as well, i.e. it's suitable for viewers with almost no prior Nix experience.
-
Oliver Charles wrote a very nice Tutorial how to develop Haskell packages with Nix.
-
The Journey into the Haskell NG infrastructure series of postings describe the new Haskell infrastructure in great detail:
-
Part 1 explains the differences between the old and the new code and gives instructions how to migrate to the new setup.
-
Part 2 looks in-depth at how to tweak and configure your setup by means of overrides.
-
Part 3 describes the infrastructure that keeps the Haskell package set in Nixpkgs up-to-date.
-