This reverts commit 0696b0ef78.
Okay, now finally, let's get this straight. We actually *want*
preferLocalBuild, *because* we have improved the source splitup in
c92dbffeac.
The idea is to use local builds in order to prevent the source being
pushed to a remote machine, splitted up there (and thus copied again)
and then being copied *again* FROM the remote machine.
"DOH!" - as @edolstra or @rbvermaa would call it... and good d^Hnight.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This now also includes support vor visio and cdr and also adds the
missing dependency on libexif.
Forcing -lX11 in NIX_LDFLAGS is no longer needed in 0.91, so we drop
that as well as the patch and the --with-python configure flag, which is
now no longer even valid.
Tests now seem to run fine without -j1 as well.
I also tested it against the DXF test file mentioned in #3449, to be
sure we don't regress here.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
The networkd implementation sets systemd.services.dhcpcd.enable to
false in nixos/modules/tasks/network-interfaces-systemd.nix. So we need
to respect that in the dhcpcd module.
If we don't, the resumeCommand is set nevertheless, which causes the
post-resume.service to fail after resuming:
Failed to reload dhcpcd.service: Unit dhcpcd.service is masked.
post-resume.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Failed to start Post-Resume Actions.
Dependency failed for Post-Resume Actions.
Unit post-resume.service entered failed state.
post-resume.service failed.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This reverts commit 26f024626c.
I actually wasn't reading the "remove" in the commit message, so sorry
for the brainfart/noise.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This reverts commit fdb5cf8107.
The reason I'm reverting this is that the implications this had on the
IO load of Hydra are fixed by c92dbffeac.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Since Chromium version 42, we have a new user namespaces sandbox in the
upstream project. It's more integrated so the chrome://sandbox page
reports it as "Namespace Sandbox" instead of SUID sandbox, which we were
re-using (or abusing?) in our patch.
So if either "SUID Sandbox" or "Namespace Sandbox" reports with "Yes",
it's fine on our side.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
