Léo Gaspard 211fee9c43 pull request template: cleanup (#117537) ... Remove elements of the PR template that have a low signal/noise ratio, and add one that I think would have a good signal/noise ratio. ----- Remove: Determined the impact on package closure size (by running `nix path-info -S` before and after) ----- Rationale: This is rarely done in practice, and apart from for specific packages this is usually not a good indicator of anything useful It might make sense to re-introduce it with two holes to fill, but then we would have to make a serious decision to never land without these two numbers filled in or with too big a regression, because in practice this box has been a no-op in many cases. Maybe just integrating this check in nixpkgs-review would bring the most benefit here? ----- ----- Remove: Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date ----- Rationale: This is fuzzy, “relevant documentation” is way too often hard to find ----- ----- Add: Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking ----- Rationale: This is way too often forgotten, and is also a self-contained easy task -----		2021-05-21 03:06:21 +02:00
..
ISSUE_TEMPLATE
workflows	.github/workflows/merge-staging.yml: Include branch in comment	2021-05-13 13:58:14 +02:00
CODEOWNERS	pkgs/top-level: init expression for haskell-updates jobset	2021-05-03 11:40:03 +02:00
CONTRIBUTING.md	treewide: stdenv.lib -> lib	2021-01-24 01:49:49 +01:00
ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
labeler.yml	.github/labeler.yml: Update GNOME file patterns	2021-05-12 19:38:41 +02:00
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md	pull request template: cleanup (#117537)	2021-05-21 03:06:21 +02:00
STALE-BOT.md
stale.yml