mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git
synced 2024-12-11 15:15:36 +00:00
54737e329b
For whatever reason, nix-build ... --argstr a.b "c" doesn't work. It fails quitely so it's best to use an example here that works.
469 lines
20 KiB
XML
469 lines
20 KiB
XML
<chapter xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
|
|
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
|
|
xml:id="chap-cross">
|
|
<title>Cross-compilation</title>
|
|
<section xml:id="sec-cross-intro">
|
|
<title>Introduction</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
"Cross-compilation" means compiling a program on one machine for another type
|
|
of machine. For example, a typical use of cross-compilation is to compile
|
|
programs for embedded devices. These devices often don't have the computing
|
|
power and memory to compile their own programs. One might think that
|
|
cross-compilation is a fairly niche concern. However, there are significant
|
|
advantages to rigorously distinguishing between build-time and run-time
|
|
environments! This applies even when one is developing and deploying on the
|
|
same machine. Nixpkgs is increasingly adopting the opinion that packages
|
|
should be written with cross-compilation in mind, and nixpkgs should evaluate
|
|
in a similar way (by minimizing cross-compilation-specific special cases)
|
|
whether or not one is cross-compiling.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
This chapter will be organized in three parts. First, it will describe the
|
|
basics of how to package software in a way that supports cross-compilation.
|
|
Second, it will describe how to use Nixpkgs when cross-compiling. Third, it
|
|
will describe the internal infrastructure supporting cross-compilation.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
<!--============================================================-->
|
|
<section xml:id="sec-cross-packaging">
|
|
<title>Packaging in a cross-friendly manner</title>
|
|
|
|
<section xml:id="sec-cross-platform-parameters">
|
|
<title>Platform parameters</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Nixpkgs follows the <link
|
|
xlink:href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Configure-Terms.html">conventions
|
|
of GNU autoconf</link>. We distinguish between 3 types of platforms when
|
|
building a derivation: <wordasword>build</wordasword>,
|
|
<wordasword>host</wordasword>, and <wordasword>target</wordasword>. In
|
|
summary, <wordasword>build</wordasword> is the platform on which a package
|
|
is being built, <wordasword>host</wordasword> is the platform on which it
|
|
will run. The third attribute, <wordasword>target</wordasword>, is relevant
|
|
only for certain specific compilers and build tools.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
In Nixpkgs, these three platforms are defined as attribute sets under the
|
|
names <literal>buildPlatform</literal>, <literal>hostPlatform</literal>,
|
|
and <literal>targetPlatform</literal>. They are always defined as
|
|
attributes in the standard environment. That means one can access them
|
|
like:
|
|
<programlisting>{ stdenv, fooDep, barDep, .. }: ...stdenv.buildPlatform...</programlisting>
|
|
.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<variablelist>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>buildPlatform</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The "build platform" is the platform on which a package is built. Once
|
|
someone has a built package, or pre-built binary package, the build
|
|
platform should not matter and can be ignored.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>hostPlatform</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The "host platform" is the platform on which a package will be run. This
|
|
is the simplest platform to understand, but also the one with the worst
|
|
name.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>targetPlatform</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The "target platform" attribute is, unlike the other two attributes, not
|
|
actually fundamental to the process of building software. Instead, it is
|
|
only relevant for compatibility with building certain specific compilers
|
|
and build tools. It can be safely ignored for all other packages.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The build process of certain compilers is written in such a way that the
|
|
compiler resulting from a single build can itself only produce binaries
|
|
for a single platform. The task of specifying this single "target
|
|
platform" is thus pushed to build time of the compiler. The root cause of
|
|
this that the compiler (which will be run on the host) and the standard
|
|
library/runtime (which will be run on the target) are built by a single
|
|
build process.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
There is no fundamental need to think about a single target ahead of
|
|
time like this. If the tool supports modular or pluggable backends, both
|
|
the need to specify the target at build time and the constraint of
|
|
having only a single target disappear. An example of such a tool is
|
|
LLVM.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Although the existence of a "target platfom" is arguably a historical
|
|
mistake, it is a common one: examples of tools that suffer from it are
|
|
GCC, Binutils, GHC and Autoconf. Nixpkgs tries to avoid sharing in the
|
|
mistake where possible. Still, because the concept of a target platform
|
|
is so ingrained, it is best to support it as is.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
</variablelist>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
The exact schema these fields follow is a bit ill-defined due to a long and
|
|
convoluted evolution, but this is slowly being cleaned up. You can see
|
|
examples of ones used in practice in
|
|
<literal>lib.systems.examples</literal>; note how they are not all very
|
|
consistent. For now, here are few fields can count on them containing:
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<variablelist>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>system</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This is a two-component shorthand for the platform. Examples of this
|
|
would be "x86_64-darwin" and "i686-linux"; see
|
|
<literal>lib.systems.doubles</literal> for more. The first component
|
|
corresponds to the CPU architecture of the platform and the second to the
|
|
operating system of the platform (<literal>[cpu]-[os]</literal>). This
|
|
format has built-in support in Nix, such as the
|
|
<varname>builtins.currentSystem</varname> impure string.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>config</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This is a 3- or 4- component shorthand for the platform. Examples of this
|
|
would be <literal>x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu</literal> and
|
|
<literal>aarch64-apple-darwin14</literal>. This is a standard format
|
|
called the "LLVM target triple", as they are pioneered by LLVM. In the
|
|
4-part form, this corresponds to
|
|
<literal>[cpu]-[vendor]-[os]-[abi]</literal>. This format is strictly
|
|
more informative than the "Nix host double", as the previous format could
|
|
analogously be termed. This needs a better name than
|
|
<varname>config</varname>!
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>parsed</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This is a Nix representation of a parsed LLVM target triple
|
|
with white-listed components. This can be specified directly,
|
|
or actually parsed from the <varname>config</varname>. See
|
|
<literal>lib.systems.parse</literal> for the exact
|
|
representation.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>libc</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This is a string identifying the standard C library used. Valid
|
|
identifiers include "glibc" for GNU libc, "libSystem" for Darwin's
|
|
Libsystem, and "uclibc" for µClibc. It should probably be refactored to
|
|
use the module system, like <varname>parse</varname>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>is*</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
These predicates are defined in <literal>lib.systems.inspect</literal>,
|
|
and slapped onto every platform. They are superior to the ones in
|
|
<varname>stdenv</varname> as they force the user to be explicit about
|
|
which platform they are inspecting. Please use these instead of those.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
<varlistentry>
|
|
<term>
|
|
<varname>platform</varname>
|
|
</term>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This is, quite frankly, a dumping ground of ad-hoc settings (it's an
|
|
attribute set). See <literal>lib.systems.platforms</literal> for
|
|
examples—there's hopefully one in there that will work verbatim for
|
|
each platform that is working. Please help us triage these flags and
|
|
give them better homes!
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</varlistentry>
|
|
</variablelist>
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
<section xml:id="sec-cross-specifying-dependencies">
|
|
<title>Specifying Dependencies</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
In this section we explore the relationship between both runtime and
|
|
build-time dependencies and the 3 Autoconf platforms.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
A runtime dependency between 2 packages implies that between them both the
|
|
host and target platforms match. This is directly implied by the meaning of
|
|
"host platform" and "runtime dependency": The package dependency exists
|
|
while both packages are running on a single host platform.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
A build time dependency, however, implies a shift in platforms between the
|
|
depending package and the depended-on package. The meaning of a build time
|
|
dependency is that to build the depending package we need to be able to run
|
|
the depended-on's package. The depending package's build platform is
|
|
therefore equal to the depended-on package's host platform. Analogously,
|
|
the depending package's host platform is equal to the depended-on package's
|
|
target platform.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
In this manner, given the 3 platforms for one package, we can determine the
|
|
three platforms for all its transitive dependencies. This is the most
|
|
important guiding principle behind cross-compilation with Nixpkgs, and will
|
|
be called the <wordasword>sliding window principle</wordasword>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Some examples will make this clearer. If a package is being built with a
|
|
<literal>(build, host, target)</literal> platform triple of <literal>(foo,
|
|
bar, bar)</literal>, then its build-time dependencies would have a triple of
|
|
<literal>(foo, foo, bar)</literal>, and <emphasis>those packages'</emphasis>
|
|
build-time dependencies would have a triple of <literal>(foo, foo,
|
|
foo)</literal>. In other words, it should take two "rounds" of following
|
|
build-time dependency edges before one reaches a fixed point where, by the
|
|
sliding window principle, the platform triple no longer changes. Indeed,
|
|
this happens with cross-compilation, where only rounds of native
|
|
dependencies starting with the second necessarily coincide with native
|
|
packages.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<note>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The depending package's target platform is unconstrained by the sliding
|
|
window principle, which makes sense in that one can in principle build
|
|
cross compilers targeting arbitrary platforms.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</note>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
How does this work in practice? Nixpkgs is now structured so that build-time
|
|
dependencies are taken from <varname>buildPackages</varname>, whereas
|
|
run-time dependencies are taken from the top level attribute set. For
|
|
example, <varname>buildPackages.gcc</varname> should be used at build-time,
|
|
while <varname>gcc</varname> should be used at run-time. Now, for most of
|
|
Nixpkgs's history, there was no <varname>buildPackages</varname>, and most
|
|
packages have not been refactored to use it explicitly. Instead, one can use
|
|
the six (<emphasis>gasp</emphasis>) attributes used for specifying
|
|
dependencies as documented in <xref linkend="ssec-stdenv-dependencies"/>. We
|
|
"splice" together the run-time and build-time package sets with
|
|
<varname>callPackage</varname>, and then <varname>mkDerivation</varname> for
|
|
each of four attributes pulls the right derivation out. This splicing can be
|
|
skipped when not cross-compiling as the package sets are the same, but is a
|
|
bit slow for cross-compiling. Because of this, a best-of-both-worlds
|
|
solution is in the works with no splicing or explicit access of
|
|
<varname>buildPackages</varname> needed. For now, feel free to use either
|
|
method.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<note>
|
|
<para>
|
|
There is also a "backlink" <varname>targetPackages</varname>, yielding a
|
|
package set whose <varname>buildPackages</varname> is the current package
|
|
set. This is a hack, though, to accommodate compilers with lousy build
|
|
systems. Please do not use this unless you are absolutely sure you are
|
|
packaging such a compiler and there is no other way.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</note>
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
<section xml:id="sec-cross-cookbook">
|
|
<title>Cross packaging cookbook</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Some frequently encountered problems when packaging for cross-compilation
|
|
should be answered here. Ideally, the information above is exhaustive, so
|
|
this section cannot provide any new information, but it is ludicrous and
|
|
cruel to expect everyone to spend effort working through the interaction of
|
|
many features just to figure out the same answer to the same common problem.
|
|
Feel free to add to this list!
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<qandaset>
|
|
<qandaentry xml:id="cross-qa-build-c-program-in-build-environment">
|
|
<question>
|
|
<para>
|
|
What if my package's build system needs to build a C program to be run
|
|
under the build environment?
|
|
</para>
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
<para>
|
|
<programlisting>depsBuildBuild = [ buildPackages.stdenv.cc ];</programlisting>
|
|
Add it to your <function>mkDerivation</function> invocation.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
<qandaentry xml:id="cross-qa-fails-to-find-ar">
|
|
<question>
|
|
<para>
|
|
My package fails to find <command>ar</command>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Many packages assume that an unprefixed <command>ar</command> is
|
|
available, but Nix doesn't provide one. It only provides a prefixed one,
|
|
just as it only does for all the other binutils programs. It may be
|
|
necessary to patch the package to fix the build system to use a prefixed
|
|
`ar`.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
<qandaentry xml:id="cross-testsuite-runs-host-code">
|
|
<question>
|
|
<para>
|
|
My package's testsuite needs to run host platform code.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
<para>
|
|
<programlisting>doCheck = stdenv.hostPlatform != stdenv.buildPlatfrom;</programlisting>
|
|
Add it to your <function>mkDerivation</function> invocation.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
</qandaset>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</section>
|
|
<!--============================================================-->
|
|
<section xml:id="sec-cross-usage">
|
|
<title>Cross-building packages</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Nixpkgs can be instantiated with <varname>localSystem</varname> alone, in
|
|
which case there is no cross-compiling and everything is built by and for
|
|
that system, or also with <varname>crossSystem</varname>, in which case
|
|
packages run on the latter, but all building happens on the former. Both
|
|
parameters take the same schema as the 3 (build, host, and target) platforms
|
|
defined in the previous section. As mentioned above,
|
|
<literal>lib.systems.examples</literal> has some platforms which are used as
|
|
arguments for these parameters in practice. You can use them
|
|
programmatically, or on the command line:
|
|
<programlisting>
|
|
nix-build <nixpkgs> --arg crossSystem '(import <nixpkgs/lib>).systems.examples.fooBarBaz' -A whatever</programlisting>
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<note>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Eventually we would like to make these platform examples an unnecessary
|
|
convenience so that
|
|
<programlisting>
|
|
nix-build <nixpkgs> --arg crossSystem '{ config = "<arch>-<os>-<vendor>-<abi>"; }' -A whatever</programlisting>
|
|
works in the vast majority of cases. The problem today is dependencies on
|
|
other sorts of configuration which aren't given proper defaults. We rely on
|
|
the examples to crudely to set those configuration parameters in some
|
|
vaguely sane manner on the users behalf. Issue
|
|
<link xlink:href="https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/34274">#34274</link>
|
|
tracks this inconvenience along with its root cause in crufty configuration
|
|
options.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</note>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
While one is free to pass both parameters in full, there's a lot of logic to
|
|
fill in missing fields. As discussed in the previous section, only one of
|
|
<varname>system</varname>, <varname>config</varname>, and
|
|
<varname>parsed</varname> is needed to infer the other two. Additionally,
|
|
<varname>libc</varname> will be inferred from <varname>parse</varname>.
|
|
Finally, <literal>localSystem.system</literal> is also
|
|
<emphasis>impurely</emphasis> inferred based on the platform evaluation
|
|
occurs. This means it is often not necessary to pass
|
|
<varname>localSystem</varname> at all, as in the command-line example in the
|
|
previous paragraph.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<note>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Many sources (manual, wiki, etc) probably mention passing
|
|
<varname>system</varname>, <varname>platform</varname>, along with the
|
|
optional <varname>crossSystem</varname> to nixpkgs: <literal>import
|
|
<nixpkgs> { system = ..; platform = ..; crossSystem = ..;
|
|
}</literal>. Passing those two instead of <varname>localSystem</varname> is
|
|
still supported for compatibility, but is discouraged. Indeed, much of the
|
|
inference we do for these parameters is motivated by compatibility as much
|
|
as convenience.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</note>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
One would think that <varname>localSystem</varname> and
|
|
<varname>crossSystem</varname> overlap horribly with the three
|
|
<varname>*Platforms</varname> (<varname>buildPlatform</varname>,
|
|
<varname>hostPlatform,</varname> and <varname>targetPlatform</varname>; see
|
|
<varname>stage.nix</varname> or the manual). Actually, those identifiers are
|
|
purposefully not used here to draw a subtle but important distinction: While
|
|
the granularity of having 3 platforms is necessary to properly *build*
|
|
packages, it is overkill for specifying the user's *intent* when making a
|
|
build plan or package set. A simple "build vs deploy" dichotomy is adequate:
|
|
the sliding window principle described in the previous section shows how to
|
|
interpolate between the these two "end points" to get the 3 platform triple
|
|
for each bootstrapping stage. That means for any package a given package set,
|
|
even those not bound on the top level but only reachable via dependencies or
|
|
<varname>buildPackages</varname>, the three platforms will be defined as one
|
|
of <varname>localSystem</varname> or <varname>crossSystem</varname>, with the
|
|
former replacing the latter as one traverses build-time dependencies. A last
|
|
simple difference is that <varname>crossSystem</varname> should be null when
|
|
one doesn't want to cross-compile, while the <varname>*Platform</varname>s
|
|
are always non-null. <varname>localSystem</varname> is always non-null.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
<!--============================================================-->
|
|
<section xml:id="sec-cross-infra">
|
|
<title>Cross-compilation infrastructure</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
To be written.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<note>
|
|
<para>
|
|
If one explores Nixpkgs, they will see derivations with names like
|
|
<literal>gccCross</literal>. Such <literal>*Cross</literal> derivations is a
|
|
holdover from before we properly distinguished between the host and target
|
|
platforms—the derivation with "Cross" in the name covered the <literal>build
|
|
= host != target</literal> case, while the other covered the <literal>host =
|
|
target</literal>, with build platform the same or not based on whether one
|
|
was using its <literal>.nativeDrv</literal> or <literal>.crossDrv</literal>.
|
|
This ugliness will disappear soon.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</note>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</chapter>
|