This is very similar to what we had in bb0b0822ef.
The xlocale.h header is no longer existing in glibc version 2.26, so we
need to avoid including it.
I've tested building against all of the libcxx attributes of LLVM 3.5,
3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 4 and 5.
All of them succeeded except version 3.5, which failed because of an
unrelated issue (build of libc++abi has failed, one of its
dependencies), so I only verified whether the patch applies cleanly.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Cc: @vcunat
I don't know where this comes from (I accidentally did that as well
once), but some derivations seem to use `buildPhases` rather than
`phases` in their derivations.
This kills all improper usages as the lack of a `phases` argument
didn't break the build, so this can be safely removed.
Searching the web for the base-16 encoded hash of the one we have in the
Nix expression didn't give any results and I also couldn't find the
older tarball anywhere (even the mirrors I've checked don't have it).
So checking the updated hash I've found that other distros use this, so
I'd bet it's safe to do this.
I've tested building the package but I didn't do any runtime test.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Cc: @the-kenny
Since glibc 2.26, struct ucontext no longer exists but is wrapped in a
typedef ucontext_t.
This is basically a backport of the patch to gcc version 4.5 which was
introduced by @vcunat in f04b64c1e9.
Building against x86_64-linux and i686-linux now succeeds.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Cc: @abbradar
Netatalk 3.1.11 is the latest stable release. There is also a nasty bug
with netatalk < 3.1.11 (https://sourceforge.net/p/netatalk/bugs/636/)
that prevents using netatalk shares for time machine backups.
The header file xlocale.h has been removed in glibc 2.26.
Quoting the release notes[1]:
* The nonstandard header <xlocale.h> has been removed. Most programs
should use <locale.h> instead. If you have a specific need for the
definition of locale_t with no other declarations, please contact
libc-alpha@sourceware.org and explain.
I've backported HaxeFoundation/neko@e286c8f330
against version 2.1.0 and the build now succeeds.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Fixes the build failure after the upgrade to glibc 2.26 in
9bb67d5c1e.
From the cfree(3) manpage:
This function should never be used. Use free(3) instead. Starting with
version 2.26, it has been removed from glibc.
From the glibc 2.26 release notes[1]:
* The obsolete function cfree has been removed. Applications should use
free instead.
[1]: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-08/msg00010.html
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Cc: @7c6f434c, @tohl