continuation of #109595
pkgconfig was aliased in 2018, however, it remained in
all-packages.nix due to its wide usage. This cleans
up the remaining references to pkgs.pkgsconfig and
moves the entry to aliases.nix.
python3Packages.pkgconfig remained unchanged because
it's the canonical name of the upstream package
on pypi.
The comment at the top of git-and-tools/default.nix said:
/* All git-relates tools live here, in a separate attribute set so that users
* can get a fast overview over what's available.
but unfortunately that hasn't actually held up in practice.
Git-related packages have continued to be added to the top level, or
into gitAndTools, or sometimes both, basically at random, so having
gitAndTools is just confusing. In fact, until I looked as part of
working on getting rid of gitAndTools, one program (ydiff) was
packaged twice independently, once in gitAndTools and once at the top
level (I fixed this in 98c3490196).
So I think it's for the best if we move away from gitAndTools, and
just put all the packages it previously contained at the top level.
I've implemented this here by just making gitAndTools an alias for the
top level -- this saves having loads of lines in aliases.nix. This
means that people can keep referring to gitAndTools in their
configuration, but it won't be allowed to be used within Nixpkgs, and
it won't be presented to new users by e.g. nix search.
The only other change here that I'm aware of is that
appendToName "minimal" is not longer called on the default git
package, because doing that would have necessitated having a private
gitBase variable like before. I think it makes more sense not to do
that anyway, and reserve the "minimal" suffix only for gitMinimal.
Hub fetches git from the environment by default.
This can lead to hub installations without git available, which makes little sense.
The change replaces the references with fully-qualified calls to git
Those are packages I don't use anymore for a longer time and I therefore
don't think that listing me as maintainer is a good idea. If those
should be removed now, I'd be fine with that.
SuperSandro2000 will take care of a few packages[1].
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/108126#pullrequestreview-560599381
###### Motivation for this change
Update to latest upstream version
###### Things done
* [ ] Tested using sandboxing ([nix.useSandbox](http://nixos.org/nixos/manual/options.html#opt-nix.useSandbox) on NixOS, or option `sandbox` in [`nix.conf`](http://nixos.org/nix/manual/#sec-conf-file) on non-NixOS linux)
* Built on platform(s)
* [x] NixOS
* [ ] macOS
* [ ] other Linux distributions
* [ ] Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside [nixos/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/tests))
* [ ] Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"`
* [x] Tested execution of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
* [ ] Determined the impact on package closure size (by running `nix path-info -S` before and after)
* [ ] Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
* [x] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md).
###### Notify maintainers
cc @blitz @Ma27 @tfc @worldofpeace
This makes the git HTML manual reproducible.
It also removes the `git.info` manual, since this one is
basically entirely broken anyway. This likely happened
when we migrated from asciidoc to asciidoctor in #102020.
I don't suggest going back to asciidoc: that would
re-introduce a python2 dependency and another
reproducibility issue with the HTML docs.
Co-Authored-By: Dmitry Kalinkin <dmitry.kalinkin@gmail.com>
