- Enable the shared library build on darwin by default to match other
platforms.
- Fix the dylib file's name in the store
- Symlink a versioned name as some tooling expects this.
Before commit 54fa0cfe4e, the `redshift`
service was run with the environment variable `DISPLAY` set to `:0`.
Commit 54fa0cfe4e changed this to
instead use the value of the `services.xserver.display` configuration
option in the value of the `DISPLAY` variable. In so doing, no default
value was provided for the case where `services.xserver.display` is
`null`.
While the default value of `services.xserver.display` is `0`, use of
which by the `redshift` module would result in `DISPLAY` again being
set to `:0`, `services.xserver.display` may also be `null`, to which
value it is set by, e.g., the `lightdm` module.
In the case that `services.xserver.display` is `null`, with the change
made in commit 54fa0cfe4e, the `DISPLAY`
variable in the environment of the `redshift` service would be set to
`:` (a single colon), which, according to my personal experience,
would result in —
- the `redshift` service failing to start; and
- systemd repeatedly attempting to restart the `redshift` service,
looping indefinitely, while the hapless `redshift` spews error
messages into the journal.
It can be observed that the malformed value of `DISPLAY` is likely at
fault for this issue by executing the following commands in an
ordinary shell, with a suitable `redshift` executable, and the X11
display not already tinted:
- `redshift -O 2500` — This command should reduce the color
temperature of the display (making it more reddish).
- `DISPLAY=':' redshift -O 6500` — This command should raise the
color temperature back up, were it not for the `DISPLAY`
environment variable being set to `:` for it, which should cause
it to, instead, fail with several error messages.
This commit attempts to fix this issue by having the `DISPLAY`
environment variable for the `redshift` service default to its old
value of `:0` in the case that `services.xserver.display` is `null`.
I have tested this solution on NixOS, albeit without the benefit of a
system with multiple displays.
This reverts commit 86caec1be1.
In this commit tests were re-enabled, but without correctly testing whether it could.
When a package builds it doesn't mean the tests are actually run. This is often seen when it says that 0 tests were run.
Typically this is because the test runner was invoked incorrectly.
By re-enabling the tests, a false impression is generated that the package is tested while in fact it isn't. Furthermore, the Python 3.5
package broke because the tests are invoked incorrectly.
cc @abbradar
(cherry picked from commit 93d8ab8007)
I checked with kdenlive people, and they say that we should always use the
latest mlt possible; that it should not be any problem, and provide only
improvements.
