1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git synced 2024-11-28 08:31:59 +00:00
Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Graham Christensen 77161de454
nixpkgs docs: format =) 2018-05-01 19:54:21 -04:00
Christian Zagrodnick 725d25dbb3 doc / go building: improve
Move the paragraph about go2nix to the other paragraphs about dependencies.
2017-06-27 16:34:03 +02:00
Kamil Chmielewski 914e0e594c buildGoPackage: deps.json -> deps.nix in NIXON
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/17254#issuecomment-245295541

* update docs to describe `deps.nix`
* include goDeps in nix-shell GOPATH
* NixOS 16.09 rel notes about replacing goPackages
2016-09-16 00:04:55 +01:00
Kamil Chmielewski da3ddd48e4 buildGoPackage: remove Go deps file libs.json
After #16017 there were a lot
of comments saying that `nix` would be better than `JSON`
for Go packages dependency sets.
As said in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/16017#issuecomment-229624046

    > Because of the content-addressable store, if two programs have the
    > same dependency it will already result in the same derivation in
    > the
    > store. Git also has compression in the pack files so it won't make
    > much difference to duplicate the dependencies on disk. And finally
    > most users will just use the binary builds so it won't make any
    > differences to them.

This PR removes `libs.json` file and puts all package dependencies in
theirs `deps.json`.
2016-08-11 23:07:09 +02:00
Kamil Chmielewski 7d02cc1dd5 all-packages references to Go packages includes all outputs 2016-06-11 18:57:29 +02:00
Kamil Chmielewski 14d49ddc40 buildGoPackage: updated docs for goPackages after rework in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/16017 2016-06-10 20:31:20 +02:00
Chris Martin d24523cc13 nixpkgs manual: fix link to go2nix 2016-04-22 14:51:49 -07:00
Vladimír Čunát ef21e5ee60 nixpkgs manual: split languages into separate files
There's no change in content except for amending the title of the
section to mention "frameworks", as e.g. I don't consider Qt a language,
and it's likely there will be more of similar cases in future.

To be certain, I checked diff of the generated HTMLs.
2015-12-19 16:08:00 +01:00