mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git
synced 2024-11-22 13:41:26 +00:00
Rephrase documentation for both makeWrapper implementations
This commit is contained in:
parent
df13841609
commit
c42e6741b2
|
@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ The standard environment provides a number of useful functions.
|
|||
|
||||
### `makeWrapper` \<executable\> \<wrapperfile\> \<args\> {#fun-makeWrapper}
|
||||
|
||||
Constructs a wrapper for a program with various possible arguments. It is defined as part of a setup-hook by the same name, so to use it you have to add `makeWrapper` to your `nativeBuildInputs`. Here's a usage example:
|
||||
Constructs a wrapper for a program with various possible arguments. It is defined as part of 2 setup-hooks named `makeWrapper` and `makeBinaryWrapper` that implement the same bash functions. Hence, to use it you have to add `makeWrapper` to your `nativeBuildInputs`. Here's an example usage:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# adds `FOOBAR=baz` to `$out/bin/foo`’s environment
|
||||
|
@ -786,17 +786,11 @@ makeWrapper $out/bin/foo $wrapperfile --set FOOBAR baz
|
|||
makeWrapper $out/bin/foo $wrapperfile --prefix PATH : ${lib.makeBinPath [ hello git ]}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
There’s many more kinds of arguments, they are documented in `nixpkgs/pkgs/build-support/setup-hooks/make-wrapper.sh`.
|
||||
There’s many more kinds of arguments, they are documented in `nixpkgs/pkgs/build-support/setup-hooks/make-wrapper.sh` for the `makeWrapper` implementation and in `nixpkgs/pkgs/build-support/setup-hooks/make-binary-wrapper.sh` for the `makeBinaryWrapper` implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
`wrapProgram` is a convenience function you probably want to use most of the time.
|
||||
`wrapProgram` is a convenience function you probably want to use most of the time, implemented by both `makeWrapper` and `makeBinaryWrapper`.
|
||||
|
||||
### `makeBinaryWrapper` \<executable\> \<wrapperfile\> \<args\> {#fun-makeBinaryWrapper}
|
||||
|
||||
A setup-hook very similar to `makeWrapper`, only it creates a tiny _compiled_ wrapper executable, that can be used as a shebang interpreter. This is needed mostly on Darwin, where shebangs cannot point to scripts, [due to a limitation with the `execve`-syscall](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67100831/macos-shebang-with-absolute-path-not-working). The arguments it accepts are similar to those of `makeWrapper` and they are documented in `nixpkgs/pkgs/build-support/setup-hooks/make-binary-wrapper.sh`.
|
||||
|
||||
Compiled wrappers generated by `makeBinaryWrapper` can be inspected with `less <path-to-wrapper>` - by scrolling past the binary data you should be able to see the C code that generated the executable and there see the environment variables that were injected into the wrapper.
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly to `wrapProgram`, the `makeBinaryWrapper` setup-hook provides a `binaryWrapProgram` with similar command line arguments.
|
||||
Using the `makeBinaryWrapper` implementation is usually preferred, as it creates a tiny _compiled_ wrapper executable, that can be used as a shebang interpreter. This is needed mostly on Darwin, where shebangs cannot point to scripts, [due to a limitation with the `execve`-syscall](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67100831/macos-shebang-with-absolute-path-not-working). Compiled wrappers generated by `makeBinaryWrapper` can be inspected with `less <path-to-wrapper>` - by scrolling past the binary data you should be able to see the shell command that generated the executable and there see the environment variables that were injected into the wrapper.
|
||||
|
||||
### `substitute` \<infile\> \<outfile\> \<subs\> {#fun-substitute}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -871,13 +865,7 @@ someVar=$(stripHash $name)
|
|||
|
||||
### `wrapProgram` \<executable\> \<makeWrapperArgs\> {#fun-wrapProgram}
|
||||
|
||||
Convenience function for `makeWrapper` that replaces `<\executable\>` with a wrapper that executes the original program. It takes all the same arguments as `makeWrapper`, except for `--argv0`.
|
||||
|
||||
If you will apply it multiple times, it will overwrite the wrapper file and you will end up with double wrapping, which should be avoided.
|
||||
|
||||
### `binaryWrapProgram` \<executable\> \<makeBinaryWrapperArgs\> {#fun-binaryWrapProgram}
|
||||
|
||||
Convenience function for `makeBinaryWrapper` that replaces `<\executable\>` with a wrapper that executes the original program. It takes all the same arguments as `makeBinaryWrapper`, except for `--argv0`.
|
||||
Convenience function for `makeWrapper` that replaces `<\executable\>` with a wrapper that executes the original program. It takes all the same arguments as `makeWrapper`, except for `--inherit-argv0` (used by the `makeBinaryWrapper` implementation and `--argv0` (used by both `makeWrapper` and `makeBinaryWrapper` wrapper implementations).
|
||||
|
||||
If you will apply it multiple times, it will overwrite the wrapper file and you will end up with double wrapping, which should be avoided.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue