mirrors/nixpkgs
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git synced 2024-11-18 11:40:45 +00:00
Code Issues Wiki Activity
nixpkgs/.github/workflows/check-cherry-picks.yml

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

26 lines
636 B
YAML
Raw Normal View History

add "Check cherry-picks" github action the intention being to catch commits which declare themselves as cherry-picks, but either: - don't refer to a commit in the master or staging branches - are significantly altered from their original commit determining the latter is not an exact science, but the heuristic of looking for differences in only the added or removed lines seems to work quite well. still, this should be considered an assistant for reviewers rather than a hard failure. unfortunately github workflows don't have a way of raising a gentle warning instead of a failure. the formatting of the output also leaves something to be desired due to the limitations of github actions' "group" commands.
2022-05-07 12:54:51 +01:00
name: "Check cherry-picks"
on:
pull_request_target:
branches:
ci: fix the branch patterns of the 'Check cherry-picks' action For reference on the acceptable pattern: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#filter-pattern-cheat-sheet
2024-04-09 18:27:11 +01:00
- 'release-**'
- 'staging-**'
check-cherry-picks workflow: don't run for staging-next PRs
2024-06-12 21:07:03 +01:00
- '!staging-next'
add "Check cherry-picks" github action the intention being to catch commits which declare themselves as cherry-picks, but either: - don't refer to a commit in the master or staging branches - are significantly altered from their original commit determining the latter is not an exact science, but the heuristic of looking for differences in only the added or removed lines seems to work quite well. still, this should be considered an assistant for reviewers rather than a hard failure. unfortunately github workflows don't have a way of raising a gentle warning instead of a failure. the formatting of the output also leaves something to be desired due to the limitations of github actions' "group" commands.
2022-05-07 12:54:51 +01:00
permissions: {}
jobs:
check:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.repository_owner == 'NixOS'
steps:
build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4.1.4 to 4.1.5 Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 4.1.4 to 4.1.5. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/0ad4b8fadaa221de15dcec353f45205ec38ea70b...44c2b7a8a4ea60a981eaca3cf939b5f4305c123b) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/checkout dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
2024-05-13 12:43:41 +01:00
- uses: actions/checkout@44c2b7a8a4ea60a981eaca3cf939b5f4305c123b # v4.1.5
add "Check cherry-picks" github action the intention being to catch commits which declare themselves as cherry-picks, but either: - don't refer to a commit in the master or staging branches - are significantly altered from their original commit determining the latter is not an exact science, but the heuristic of looking for differences in only the added or removed lines seems to work quite well. still, this should be considered an assistant for reviewers rather than a hard failure. unfortunately github workflows don't have a way of raising a gentle warning instead of a failure. the formatting of the output also leaves something to be desired due to the limitations of github actions' "group" commands.
2022-05-07 12:54:51 +01:00
with:
fetch-depth: 0
filter: blob:none
- name: Check cherry-picks
env:
BASE_SHA: ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha }}
HEAD_SHA: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
run: |
./maintainers/scripts/check-cherry-picks.sh "$BASE_SHA" "$HEAD_SHA"
Copy permalink