forked from mirrors/akkoma
Change what nodeinfo returns without breaking backwards compatibility
* Only for SimplePolicy for now * I added an extra mrf_simple_info key that has an object as value. The object contains only relevant extra info
This commit is contained in:
parent
7fdc3cde06
commit
47fc57bbcc
|
@ -260,15 +260,27 @@ def filter(object), do: {:ok, object}
|
|||
def describe do
|
||||
exclusions = Config.get([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions]) |> MRF.instance_list_from_tuples()
|
||||
|
||||
mrf_simple =
|
||||
mrf_simple_excluded =
|
||||
Config.get(:mrf_simple)
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {k, v} -> {k, Enum.reject(v, fn {v, _} -> v in exclusions end)} end)
|
||||
|
||||
mrf_simple =
|
||||
mrf_simple_excluded
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {k, v} ->
|
||||
{k, Enum.map(v, fn {i, r} -> %{"instance" => i, "reason" => r} end)}
|
||||
{k, Enum.map(v, fn {instance, _} -> instance end)}
|
||||
end)
|
||||
|> Enum.into(%{})
|
||||
|
||||
{:ok, %{mrf_simple: mrf_simple}}
|
||||
mrf_simple_info =
|
||||
mrf_simple_excluded
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {k, v} -> {k, Enum.reject(v, fn {_, reason} -> reason == "" end)} end)
|
||||
|> Enum.reject(fn {_, v} -> v == [] end)
|
||||
|> Enum.map(fn {k, l} ->
|
||||
{k, l |> Enum.map(fn {i, r} -> {i, %{"reason" => r}} end) |> Enum.into(%{})}
|
||||
end)
|
||||
|> Enum.into(%{})
|
||||
|
||||
{:ok, %{mrf_simple: mrf_simple, mrf_simple_info: mrf_simple_info}}
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
@impl true
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -166,39 +166,89 @@ test "it shows quarantined instances data if enabled", %{conn: conn} do
|
|||
assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["quarantined_instances"] == expected_config
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
test "it shows MRF transparency data if enabled", %{conn: conn} do
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :policies], [Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicy])
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :transparency], true)
|
||||
describe "MRF SimplePolicy" do
|
||||
setup do
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :policies], [Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicy])
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :transparency], true)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
simple_config = %{"reject" => [{"example.com", ""}]}
|
||||
clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
|
||||
test "shows MRF transparency data if enabled", %{conn: conn} do
|
||||
simple_config = %{"reject" => [{"example.com", ""}]}
|
||||
clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
|
||||
|
||||
expected_config = %{"reject" => [%{"instance" => "example.com", "reason" => ""}]}
|
||||
expected_config = %{"reject" => ["example.com"]}
|
||||
|
||||
response =
|
||||
conn
|
||||
|> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
|
||||
|> json_response(:ok)
|
||||
response =
|
||||
conn
|
||||
|> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
|
||||
|> json_response(:ok)
|
||||
|
||||
assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple"] == expected_config
|
||||
end
|
||||
assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple"] == expected_config
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
test "it performs exclusions from MRF transparency data if configured", %{conn: conn} do
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :policies], [Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicy])
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :transparency], true)
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], [{"other.site", "We don't want them to know"}])
|
||||
test "performs exclusions from MRF transparency data if configured", %{conn: conn} do
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], [
|
||||
{"other.site", "We don't want them to know"}
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
simple_config = %{"reject" => [{"example.com", ""}, {"other.site", ""}]}
|
||||
clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
|
||||
simple_config = %{"reject" => [{"example.com", ""}, {"other.site", ""}]}
|
||||
clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
|
||||
|
||||
expected_config = %{"reject" => [%{"instance" => "example.com", "reason" => ""}]}
|
||||
expected_config = %{"reject" => ["example.com"]}
|
||||
|
||||
response =
|
||||
conn
|
||||
|> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
|
||||
|> json_response(:ok)
|
||||
response =
|
||||
conn
|
||||
|> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
|
||||
|> json_response(:ok)
|
||||
|
||||
assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple"] == expected_config
|
||||
assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["exclusions"] == true
|
||||
assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple"] == expected_config
|
||||
assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["exclusions"] == true
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
test "shows extra information in the mrf_simple_extra field for relevant entries", %{
|
||||
conn: conn
|
||||
} do
|
||||
simple_config = %{
|
||||
media_removal: [{"no.media", "LEEWWWDD >//<"}],
|
||||
media_nsfw: [],
|
||||
federated_timeline_removal: [{"no.ftl", ""}],
|
||||
report_removal: [],
|
||||
reject: [
|
||||
{"example.instance", "Some reason"},
|
||||
{"uwu.owo", "awoo to much"},
|
||||
{"no.reason", ""}
|
||||
],
|
||||
followers_only: [],
|
||||
accept: [],
|
||||
avatar_removal: [],
|
||||
banner_removal: [],
|
||||
reject_deletes: [
|
||||
{"peak.me", "I want to peak at what they don't want me to see, eheh"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
|
||||
|
||||
clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], [
|
||||
{"peak.me", "I don't want them to know"}
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
expected_config = %{
|
||||
"media_removal" => %{
|
||||
"no.media" => %{"reason" => "LEEWWWDD >//<"}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reject" => %{
|
||||
"example.instance" => %{"reason" => "Some reason"},
|
||||
"uwu.owo" => %{"reason" => "awoo to much"}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
response =
|
||||
conn
|
||||
|> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
|
||||
|> json_response(:ok)
|
||||
|
||||
assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple_info"] == expected_config
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue