Timo Kaufmann cf63a8c94c gap: add packageSet option ... Two reasons for this: - more fine-grained space/functionality tradeoff - preparation for the sage 8.6 update, which finally doesn't need a downgraded gap anymore but does break when unexpected (non-standard) packages are installed. Details: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26983 The proper way to deal with gap packages would be to create a package set, package each one individually and have something like gap equivalent of `python.withPackages`. I am not willing to do that however.		2019-01-17 10:10:24 +01:00
..
default.nix	gap: add packageSet option	2019-01-17 10:10:24 +01:00