3
0
Fork 0
forked from mirrors/nixpkgs
nixpkgs/nixos/doc/manual/development/option-declarations.xml
Samuel Dionne-Riel 88ca2b1ec4 nixos/doc: ran make format
With visual inspection that nothing got worse.
2018-05-31 21:03:51 -04:00

200 lines
6.5 KiB
XML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<section xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
version="5.0"
xml:id="sec-option-declarations">
<title>Option Declarations</title>
<para>
An option declaration specifies the name, type and description of a NixOS
configuration option. It is invalid to define an option that hasnt been
declared in any module. An option declaration generally looks like this:
<programlisting>
options = {
<replaceable>name</replaceable> = mkOption {
type = <replaceable>type specification</replaceable>;
default = <replaceable>default value</replaceable>;
example = <replaceable>example value</replaceable>;
description = "<replaceable>Description for use in the NixOS manual.</replaceable>";
};
};
</programlisting>
The attribute names within the <replaceable>name</replaceable> attribute path
must be camel cased in general but should, as an exception, match the
<link
xlink:href="https://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#sec-package-naming">
package attribute name</link> when referencing a Nixpkgs package. For
example, the option <varname>services.nix-serve.bindAddress</varname>
references the <varname>nix-serve</varname> Nixpkgs package.
</para>
<para>
The function <varname>mkOption</varname> accepts the following arguments.
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<varname>type</varname>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
The type of the option (see <xref linkend='sec-option-types' />). It may
be omitted, but thats not advisable since it may lead to errors that
are hard to diagnose.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<varname>default</varname>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
The default value used if no value is defined by any module. A default is
not required; but if a default is not given, then users of the module
will have to define the value of the option, otherwise an error will be
thrown.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<varname>example</varname>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
An example value that will be shown in the NixOS manual.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<varname>description</varname>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
A textual description of the option, in DocBook format, that will be
included in the NixOS manual.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</para>
<section xml:id="sec-option-declarations-eot">
<title>Extensible Option Types</title>
<para>
Extensible option types is a feature that allow to extend certain types
declaration through multiple module files. This feature only work with a
restricted set of types, namely <literal>enum</literal> and
<literal>submodules</literal> and any composed forms of them.
</para>
<para>
Extensible option types can be used for <literal>enum</literal> options that
affects multiple modules, or as an alternative to related
<literal>enable</literal> options.
</para>
<para>
As an example, we will take the case of display managers. There is a central
display manager module for generic display manager options and a module file
per display manager backend (slim, sddm, gdm ...).
</para>
<para>
There are two approach to this module structure:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
Managing the display managers independently by adding an enable option to
every display manager module backend. (NixOS)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Managing the display managers in the central module by adding an option
to select which display manager backend to use.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
Both approaches have problems.
</para>
<para>
Making backends independent can quickly become hard to manage. For display
managers, there can be only one enabled at a time, but the type system can
not enforce this restriction as there is no relation between each backend
<literal>enable</literal> option. As a result, this restriction has to be
done explicitely by adding assertions in each display manager backend
module.
</para>
<para>
On the other hand, managing the display managers backends in the central
module will require to change the central module option every time a new
backend is added or removed.
</para>
<para>
By using extensible option types, it is possible to create a placeholder
option in the central module
(<xref linkend='ex-option-declaration-eot-service'
/>), and to extend
it in each backend module
(<xref
linkend='ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-slim' />,
<xref
linkend='ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-sddm' />).
</para>
<para>
As a result, <literal>displayManager.enable</literal> option values can be
added without changing the main service module file and the type system
automatically enforce that there can only be a single display manager
enabled.
</para>
<example xml:id='ex-option-declaration-eot-service'>
<title>Extensible type placeholder in the service module</title>
<screen>
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
description = "Display manager to use";
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ ]);
};</screen>
</example>
<example xml:id='ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-slim'>
<title>Extending <literal>services.xserver.displayManager.enable</literal> in the <literal>slim</literal> module</title>
<screen>
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ "slim" ]);
};</screen>
</example>
<example xml:id='ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-sddm'>
<title>Extending <literal>services.xserver.displayManager.enable</literal> in the <literal>sddm</literal> module</title>
<screen>
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ "sddm" ]);
};</screen>
</example>
<para>
The placeholder declaration is a standard <literal>mkOption</literal>
declaration, but it is important that extensible option declarations only
use the <literal>type</literal> argument.
</para>
<para>
Extensible option types work with any of the composed variants of
<literal>enum</literal> such as <literal>with types; nullOr (enum [ "foo"
"bar" ])</literal> or <literal>with types; listOf (enum [ "foo" "bar"
])</literal>.
</para>
</section>
</section>