3
0
Fork 0
forked from mirrors/nixpkgs
Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
John Ericson 72fa40f72d lib: Fix nix-env -qaP -f . --xml --meta
A merge undid my fix in d437f2c365.
2018-05-29 13:06:17 -04:00
Jan Malakhovski ad35019501 Merge branch 'master' into staging
Fixed conflicts:
- lib/systems/for-meta.nix: in favor of staging
- pkgs/os-specific/darwin/xcode/default.nix: in favor of master
2018-05-26 00:20:17 +00:00
John Ericson d437f2c365 lib: Fix nix-env -qaP -f . --xml --meta
The function value cannot be serialized so nix-env was mad. Turns out we can
just remove it like we do in `lib/systems/inspect.nix`.
2018-05-24 10:43:14 -04:00
Ben Gamari 8b32cfdbc0 lib.systems.gnu: Accept gnueabi as a gnu platform 2018-05-03 17:06:01 -04:00
John Ericson ba52ae5048 treewide: isArm -> isAarch32
Following legacy packing conventions, `isArm` was defined just for
32-bit ARM instruction set. This is confusing to non packagers though,
because Aarch64 is an ARM instruction set.

The official ARM overview for ARMv8[1] is surprisingly not confusing,
given the overall state of affairs for ARM naming conventions, and
offers us a solution. It divides the nomenclature into three levels:

```
ISA:             ARMv8   {-A, -R, -M}
                 /    \
Mode:     Aarch32     Aarch64
             |         /   \
Encoding:   A64      A32   T32
```

At the top is the overall v8 instruction set archicture. Second are the
two modes, defined by bitwidth but differing in other semantics too, and
buttom are the encodings, (hopefully?) isomorphic if they encode the
same mode.

The 32 bit encodings are mostly backwards compatible with previous
non-Thumb and Thumb encodings, and if so we can pun the mode names to
instead mean "sets of compatable or isomorphic encodings", and then
voilà we have nice names for 32-bit and 64-bit arm instruction sets
which do not use the word ARM so as to not confused either laymen or
experienced ARM packages.

[1]: https://developer.arm.com/products/architecture/a-profile
2018-04-25 15:28:55 -04:00
Shea Levy 20f51922c0
riscv-pk: Set platforms properly 2018-03-24 08:44:26 -04:00
John Ericson d9a1800239 lib: Add lib.platforms.windows 2018-03-20 12:47:45 -04:00
John Ericson 3c8ae01a45 lib: Make platforms.all actually match all platforms
Otherwise obscure cross-compilations are hampered. `all` breaks all but
the initial derivation (which we can't even write yet) in an open world
setting however, so we really shouldn't have it.
2018-03-20 12:46:19 -04:00
John Ericson 175d4ab1db lib: Make platform predicates greppable
Should have commited on here and on merged master to begin with, but I
didn't, so instead I cherry-pick.

(cherry picked from commit 88c04a8b6b)
2018-03-20 12:35:20 -04:00
John Ericson c26252af3e lib, stdenv: Check meta.platforms against host platform and be open world
First, we need check against the host platform, not the build platform.
That's simple enough.

Second, we move away from exahustive finite case analysis (i.e.
exhaustively listing all platforms the package builds on). That only
work in a closed-world setting, where we know all platforms we might
build one. But with cross compilation, we may be building for arbitrary
platforms, So we need fancier filters. This is the closed world to open
world change.

The solution is instead of having a list of systems (strings in the form
"foo-bar"), we have a list of of systems or "patterns", i.e. attributes
that partially match the output of the parsers in `lib.systems.parse`.
The "check meta" logic treats the systems strings as an exact whitelist
just as before, but treats the patterns as a fuzzy whitelist,
intersecting the actual `hostPlatform` with the pattern and then
checking for equality. (This is done using `matchAttrs`).

The default convenience lists for `meta.platforms` are now changed to be
lists of patterns (usually a single pattern) in
`lib/systems/for-meta.nix` for maximum flexibility under this new
system.

Fixes #30902
2018-03-15 00:44:34 -04:00