As part of the splicing the build/host/target combinations of the interpreter
need to be passed around internally. The chosen names were not very clear,
implying they were package sets whereas actually there were derivations.
Also, don't use autoreconfHook on Darwin with Python 3.
Darwin builds are still impure and fail with
ld: warning: directory not found for option '-L/nix/store/6yhj9djska835wb6ylg46d2yw9dl0sjb-configd-osx-10.8.5/lib'
ld: warning: directory not found for option '-L/nix/store/6yhj9djska835wb6ylg46d2yw9dl0sjb-configd-osx-10.8.5/lib'
ld: warning: object file (/nix/store/0lsij4jl35bnhqhdzla8md6xiswgig5q-Libsystem-osx-10.12.6/lib/crt1.10.6.o) was built for newer OSX version (10.12) than being linked (10.6)
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/private/tmp/nix-build-python3-3.8.3.drv-0/Python-3.8.3 ./python.exe -E -S -m sysconfig --generate-posix-vars ;\
if test $? -ne 0 ; then \
echo "generate-posix-vars failed" ; \
rm -f ./pybuilddir.txt ; \
exit 1 ; \
fi
/nix/store/dsb7d4dwxk6bzlm845z2zx6wp9a8bqc1-bash-4.4-p23/bin/bash: line 5: 72015 Killed: 9 DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/private/tmp/nix-build-python3-3.8.3.drv-0/Python-3.8.3 ./python.exe -E -S -m sysconfig --generate-posix-vars
generate-posix-vars failed
make: *** [Makefile:592: pybuilddir.txt] Error 1
I took a close look at how Debian builds the Python interpreter,
because I noticed it ran substantially faster than the one in nixpkgs
and I was curious why.
One thing that I found made a material difference in performance was
this pair of linker flags (passed to the compiler):
-Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
In other words, effectively the linker gets passed the flags:
-O1 -Bsymbolic-functions
Doing the same thing in nixpkgs turns out to make the interpreter
run about 6% faster, which is quite a big win for such an easy
change. So, let's apply it.
---
I had not known there was a `-O1` flag for the *linker*!
But indeed there is.
These flags are unrelated to "link-time optimization" (LTO), despite
the latter's name. LTO means doing classic compiler optimizations
on the actual code, at the linking step when it becomes possible to
do them with cross-object-file information. These two flags, by
contrast, cause the linker to make certain optimizations within the
scope of its job as the linker.
Documentation is here, though sparse:
https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.31/ld/Options.html
The meaning of -O1 was explained in more detail in this LWN article:
https://lwn.net/Articles/192624/
Apparently it makes the resulting symbol table use a bigger hash
table, so the load factor is smaller and lookups are faster. Cool.
As for -Bsymbolic-functions, the documentation indicates that it's a
way of saving lookups through the symbol table entirely. There can
apparently be situations where it changes the behavior of a program,
specifically if the program relies on linker tricks to provide
customization features:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfe/+bug/644645https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637184#35
But I'm pretty sure CPython doesn't permit that kind of trick: you
don't load a shared object that tries to redefine some symbol found
in the interpreter core.
The stronger reason I'm confident using -Bsymbolic-functions is
safe, though, is empirical. Both Debian and Ubuntu have been
shipping a Python built this way since forever -- it was introduced
for the Python 2.4 and 2.5 in Ubuntu "hardy", and Debian "lenny",
released in 2008 and 2009. In those 12 years they haven't seen a
need to drop this flag; and I've been unable to locate any reports
of trouble related to it, either on the Web in general or on the
Debian bug tracker. (There are reports of a handful of other
programs breaking with it, but not Python/CPython.) So that seems
like about as thorough testing as one could hope for.
---
As for the performance impact: I ran CPython upstream's preferred
benchmark suite, "pyperformance", in the same way as described in
the previous commit. On top of that commit's change, the results
across the 60 benchmarks in the suite are:
The median is 6% faster.
The middle half (aka interquartile range) is from 4% to 8% faster.
Out of 60 benchmarks, 3 come out slower, by 1-4%. At the other end,
5 are at least 10% faster, and one is 17% faster.
So, that's quite a material speedup! I don't know how big the
effect of these flags is for other software; but certainly CPython
tends to do plenty of dynamic linking, as that's how it loads
extension modules, which are ubiquitous in the stdlib as well as
popular third-party libraries. So perhaps that helps explain why
optimizing the dynamic linker has such an impact.
Without this flag, the configure script prints a warning at the end,
like this (reformatted):
If you want a release build with all stable optimizations active
(PGO, etc), please run ./configure --enable-optimizations
We're doing a build to distribute to people for day-to-day use,
doing things other than developing the Python interpreter. So
that's certainly a release build -- we're the target audience for
this recommendation.
---
And, trying it out, upstream isn't kidding! I ran the standard
benchmark suite that the CPython developers use for performance
work, "pyperformance". Following its usage instructions:
https://pyperformance.readthedocs.io/usage.html
I ran the whole suite, like so:
$ nix-shell -p ./result."$variant" --run '
cd $(mktemp -d); python -m venv venv; . venv/bin/activate
pip install pyperformance
pyperformance run -o ~/tmp/result.'"$variant"'.json
'
and then examined the results with commands like:
$ python -m pyperf compare_to --table -G \
~/tmp/result.{$before,$after}.json
Across all the benchmarks in the suite, the median speedup was 16%.
(Meaning 1.16x faster; 14% less time).
The middle half of them ranged from a 13% to a 22% speedup.
Each of the 60 benchmarks in the suite got faster, by speedups
ranging from 3% to 53%.
---
One reason this isn't just the default to begin with is that, until
recently, it made the build a lot slower. What it does is turn on
profile-guided optimization, which means first build for profiling,
then run some task to get a profile, then build again using the
profile. And, short of further customization, the task it would use
would be nearly the full test suite, which includes a lot of
expensive and slow tests, and can easily take half an hour to run.
Happily, in 2019 an upstream developer did the work to carefully
select a more appropriate set of tests to use for the profile:
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/4e16a4a31https://bugs.python.org/issue36044
This suite takes just 2 minutes to run. And the resulting final
build is actually slightly faster than with the much longer suite,
at least as measured by those standard "pyperformance" benchmarks.
That work went into the 3.8 release, but the same list works great
if used on older releases too.
So, start passing that --enable-optimizations flag; and backport
that good-for-PGO set of tests, so that we use it on all releases.
- Replaced python override from the final stdenv, instead we
propagate our bootstrap python to stage4 and override both
CF and xnu to use it.
- Removed CF argument from python interpreters, this is redundant
since it's not overidden anymore.
- Inherit CF from stage4, making it the same as the stdenv.
This will turn manylinux support back on by default.
PIP will now do runtime checks against the compatible glibc version to
determine if the current interpreter is compatible with a given
manylinux specification. However it will not check if any of the
required libraries are present.
The motivation here is that we want to support building python packages
with wheels that require manylinux support. There is no real change for
users of source builds as they are still buildings packages from source.
The real noticeable(?) change is that impure usages (e.g. running `pip
install package`) will install manylinux packages that previously
refused to install.
Previously we did claim that we were not compatible with manylinux and
thus they wouldn't be installed at all.
Now impure users will have basically the same situation as before: If
you require some wheel only package it didn't work before and will not
properly work now. Now the program will fail during runtime vs during
installation time.
I think it is a reasonable trade-off since it allows us to install
manylinux packages with nix expressions and enables tools like
poetry2nix.
This should be a net win for users as it allows wheels, that we
previously couldn't really support, to be used.
Turns out fixing this only in importlib is not sufficient and we
need to backport CPython part of the fix too.
This patch is based on https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c16063765d3a
but because the code around is different there are some changes (C-strings
instead of Python objects etc.)
With this patch Tensorflow builds successfully on many-core machine.
This commit adds a Nix-specific module that recursively adds paths that
are on `NIX_PYTHONPATH` to `sys.path`. In order to process possible
`.pth` files `site.addsitedir` is used.
The paths listed in `PYTHONPATH` are added to `sys.path` afterwards, but
they will be added before the entries we add here and thus take
precedence.
The reason for adding support for this environment variable is that we
can set it in a wrapper without breaking support for `PYTHONPATH`.
This is python bug https://bugs.python.org/issue13146. Fixed since
python 3.4. It makes pyc creation atomic, preventing a race condition.
The patch has been rebased on our deterministic build patch.
It wasn't backported to python 2.7 because there was a complaint about
changed semantics. Since files are now created in a temporary directory
and then moved, symlinks will be overridden. See
https://bugs.python.org/issue17222.
That is an edge-case however. Ubuntu and debian have backported the fix
in 2013 already, making it mainstream enough for us to adopt.
Patching numpy.distutils used to be required for pythonPackages.cython
to build on darwin. It was later accidentally disabled during one of the
refactorings, but that did not break cython. This change reinstantiates
the patch. It still applies, so it should be low maintenance and it can
still be useful.
This changeset allows for cross-compilation of Python packages. Packages
built with buildPythonPackage are not allowed to refer to the build
machine. Executables that have shebangs will refer to the host.
Each time a new major/minor version of CPython was released, a new
expression would be written, typically copied from the previous release.
Often fixes are only made in the current/latest release. By merging the
expressions it's more likely that modifications end up in all versions,
as is likely intended.
This commit introduces one expression for Python 3, and another for 2.7.
These two may also be merged, but it will result in a lot of extra
conditionals making the expression harder to follow.
A common passthru is introduced for CPython and PyPy.
python 2.7: use common passthru
This also updates the bootstrap tool builder to LLVM 5, but not the ones
we actually use for bootstrap. I'll make that change in a subsequent commit
so as to provide traceable provenance of the bootstrap tools.
* substitute(): --subst-var was silently coercing to "" if the variable does not exist.
* libffi: simplify using `checkInputs`
* pythonPackges.hypothesis, pythonPackages.pytest: simpify dependency cycle fix
* utillinux: 2.32 -> 2.32.1
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/16/532
* busybox: 1.29.0 -> 1.29.1
* bind: 9.12.1-P2 -> 9.12.2
https://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.12.2/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.12.2.html
* curl: 7.60.0 -> 7.61.0
* gvfs: make tests run, but disable
* ilmbase: disable tests on i686. Spooky!
* mdds: fix tests
* git: disable checks as tests are run in installcheck
* ruby: disable tests
* libcommuni: disable checks as tests are run in installcheck
* librdf: make tests run, but disable
* neon, neon_0_29: make tests run, but disable
* pciutils: 3.6.0 -> 3.6.1
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/pciutils/versions.
* mesa: more include fixes
mostly from void-linux (thanks!)
* npth: 1.5 -> 1.6
minor bump
* boost167: Add lockfree next_prior patch
* stdenv: cleanup darwin bootstrapping
Also gets rid of the full python and some of it's dependencies in the
stdenv build closure.
* Revert "pciutils: use standardized equivalent for canonicalize_file_name"
This reverts commit f8db20fb3a.
Patching should no longer be needed with 3.6.1.
* binutils-wrapper: Try to avoid adding unnecessary -L flags
(cherry picked from commit f3758258b8895508475caf83e92bfb236a27ceb9)
Signed-off-by: Domen Kožar <domen@dev.si>
* libffi: don't check on darwin
libffi usages in stdenv broken darwin. We need to disable doCheck for that case.
* "rm $out/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache" -> hicolor-icon-theme setup-hook
* python.pkgs.pytest: setupHook to prevent creation of .pytest-cache folder, fixes#40273
When `py.test` was run with a folder as argument, it would not only
search for tests in that folder, but also create a .pytest-cache folder.
Not only is this state we don't want, but it was also causing
collisions.
* parity-ui: fix after merge
* python.pkgs.pytest-flake8: disable test, fix build
* Revert "meson: 0.46.1 -> 0.47.0"
With meson 0.47.0 (or 0.47.1, or git)
things are very wrong re:rpath handling
resulting in at best missing libs but
even corrupt binaries :(.
When we run patchelf it masks the problem
by removing obviously busted paths.
Which is probably why this wasn't noticed immediately.
Unfortunately the binary already
has a long series of paths scribbled
in a space intended for a much smaller string;
in my testing it was something like
lengths were 67 with 300+ written to it.
I think we've reported the relevant issues upstream,
but unfortunately it appears our patches
are what introduces the overwrite/corruption
(by no longer being correct in what they assume)
This doesn't look so bad to fix but it's
not something I can spend more time on
at the moment.
--
Interestingly the overwritten string data
(because it is scribbled past the bounds)
remains in the binary and is why we're suddenly
seeing unexpected references in various builds
-- notably this is is the reason we're
seeing the "extra-utils" breakage
that entirely crippled NixOS on master
(and probably on staging before?).
Fixes#43650.
This reverts commit 305ac4dade.
(cherry picked from commit 273d68eff8)
Signed-off-by: Domen Kožar <domen@dev.si>
upstream issue:
https://bugs.python.org/issue31940
There are two PR's proposed to fix this,
but both seem to be stalling waiting for review.
I previously used what appears to be the favored
of the two approaches[1] to fix this,
with plan of keeping it musl-only until PR was merged.
However, while writing up a commit message
explaining the problem and why it needed fixing...
I investigated a bit and found it increasingly
hard to justify anything other than ...
simply not using lchmod.
Here's what I found:
* lchmod is non-POSIX, seems BSD-only these days
* Functionality of lchmod isn't supported on Linux
* best scenario on Linux would be an error
* POSIX does provide lchmod-esque functionality
with fchmodat(), which AFAICT is generally preferred.
* Python intentionally overlooks fchmodat()[2]
electing instead to use lchmod() behavior
as a proxy for whether fchmodat() "works".
I'm not sure I follow their reasoning...
* both glibc and musl provide lchmod impls:
* glibc returns ENOSYS "not implemented"
* musl implements lchmod with fchmodat(),
and so returns EOPNOTSUPP "op not supported"
* Python doesn't expect EOPNOTSUPP from lchmod,
since it's not valid on BSD's lchmod.
* "configure" doesn't actually check lchmod usefully,
instead checks for glibc preprocessor defines
to indicate if the function is just a stub[3];
somewhat fittingly, if the magic macros are defined
then the next line of the C source is "choke me",
causing the compiler to trip, fall, and point
a finger at whatever is near where it ends up.
(somewhat amusing, but AFAIK effective way to get an error :P)
I'm leaving out links to threads on mailing lists and such,
but for now I hope I've convinced you
(or to those reading commit history: explained my reasons)
that this is a bit of a mess[4].
And so instead of making a big mess messier,
and with hopes of never thinking about this again,
I propose we simply tell Python "don't use lchmod" on Linux.
[1] https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/4783
[2] 28453feaa8/Lib/os.py (L144)
[3] 28453feaa8/configure (L2198)
[4] Messes happen, no good intention goes unpunished :).
