I've failed to figure out what why `paxtest blackhat` hangs the vm, and
have resigned to running individual `paxtest` programs. This provides
limited coverage, but at least verifies that some important features are
in fact working.
Ideas for future work includes a subtest for basic desktop
functionality.
IceWM is not part of KDE 5 and is now no longer part of the test. KDE 5
applications: Dolphin, System Monitor, and System Settings are started
in this test.
VBoxService needs dbus in order to work properly, which failed to start
up so far, because it was searching in /run/current-system/sw for its
configuration files.
We now no longer run with the --system flag but specify the
configuration file directly instead.
This fixes at least the "simple-gui" test and probably the others as
well, which I haven't tested yet.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We can't use waitForWindow here because it runs xwininfo as user root,
who in turn is not authorized to connect to the X server running as
alice.
So instead, we use xprop from user alice which should fix waiting for
the VirtualBox manager window.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
The VirtualBox tests so far ran the X server as root instead of user
"alice" and it did work, because we had access control turned off by
default.
Fortunately, it was changed in 1541fa351b.
As a side effect, it caused all the VirtualBox tests to fail because
they now can't connect to the X server, which is a good thing because
it's a bug of the VirtualBox tests.
So to fix it, let's just start the X server as user alice.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This allows setting options for the same LUKS device in different
modules. For example, the auto-generated hardware-configuration.nix
can contain
boot.initrd.luks.devices.crypted.device = "/dev/disk/...";
while configuration.nix can add
boot.initrd.luks.devices.crypted.allowDiscards = true;
Also updated the examples/docs to use /disk/disk/by-uuid instead of
/dev/sda, since we shouldn't promote the use of the latter.
As @edolstra pointed out that the kernel module might be painful to
maintain. I strongly disagree because it's only a small module and it's
good to have such a canary in the tests no matter how the bootup process
looks like, so I'm going the masochistic route and try to maintain it.
If it *really* becomes too much maintenance burden, we can still drop or
disable kcanary.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We already have a small regression test for #15226 within the swraid
installer test. Unfortunately, we only check there whether the md
kthread got signalled but not whether other rampaging processes are
still alive that *should* have been killed.
So in order to do this we provide multiple canary processes which are
checked after the system has booted up:
* canary1: It's a simple forking daemon which just sleeps until it's
going to be killed. Of course we expect this process to not
be alive anymore after boot up.
* canary2: Similar to canary1, but tries to mimick a kthread to make
sure that it's going to be properly killed at the end of
stage 1.
* canary3: Like canary2, but this time using a @ in front of its
command name to actually prevent it from being killed.
* kcanary: This one is a real kthread and it runs until killed, which
shouldn't be the case.
Tested with and without 67223ee and everything works as expected, at
least on my machine.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This is a regression test for #15226, so that the test will fail once we
accidentally kill one or more of the md kthreads (aka: if safe mode is
enabled).
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Just removing the system argument because it doesn't exist (it's
actually config.nixpkgs.system, which we're already using). We won't get
an error anyway if we're not actually using it, so this is just an
aesthetics fix.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Make sure that we always have everything available within the store of
the VM, so let's evaluate/build the test container fully on the host
system and propagate all dependencies to the VM.
This way, even if there are additional default dependencies that come
with containers in the future we should be on the safe side as these
dependencies should now be included for the test as well.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Cc: @kampfschlaefer, @edolstra
This partially reverts f2d24b9840.
Instead of disabling the channels via removing the channel mapping from
the tests themselves, let's just explicitly reference the stable test in
release.nix. That way it's still possible to run the beta and dev tests
via something like "nix-build nixos/tests/chromium.nix -A beta" and
achieve the same effect of not building beta and dev versions on Hydra.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
It's not the job of Nixpkgs to distribute beta versions of upstream
packages. More importantly, building these delays channel updates by
several hours, which is bad for our security fix turnaround time.
Regression introduced by dfe608c8a2.
The commit turns the two arguments into one attrset argument so we need
to adapt that to use the new calling convention.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
The Nix store squashfs is stored inside the initrd instead of separately
(cherry picked from commit 976fd407796877b538c470d3a5253ad3e1f7bc68)
Signed-off-by: Domen Kožar <domen@dev.si>
Two fixes:
Not really sure why removing `--fail` from the curl calls is necessary,
but with that option, curl erronously reports 404 (which it shouldn't
per my interactive vm testing).
Fix paths to example files used for the printing test
Toghether, these changes allow the test to run to completion on my machine.
This adds a Taskserver module along with documentation and a small
helper tool which eases managing a custom CA along with Taskserver
organisations, users and groups.
Taskserver is the server component of Taskwarrior, a TODO list
application for the command line.
The work has been started by @matthiasbeyer back in mid 2015 and I have
continued to work on it recently, so this merge contains commits from
both of us.
Thanks particularly to @nbp and @matthiasbeyer for reviewing and
suggesting improvements.
I've tested this with the new test (nixos/tests/taskserver.nix) this
branch adds and it fails because of the changes introduced by the
closure-size branch, so we need to do additional work on base of this.
Coreutils is multi-output and the `info` output doesn't seem to be
included on the install disk, failing like this (because now nix-env
wants to build coreutils):
````
machine# these derivations will be built:
machine# /nix/store/0jk4wzg11sa6cqyw8g7w5lb35axji969-bison-3.0.4.tar.gz.drv
...
machine# /nix/store/ybjgqwxx63l8cj1s7b8axx09wz06kxbv-coreutils-8.25.drv
machine# building path(s) ‘/nix/store/4xvdi5740vq8vlsi48lik3saz0v5jsx0-coreutils-8.25.tar.xz’
machine# downloading ‘http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/coreutils/coreutils-8.25.tar.xz’...
machine# error: unable to download ‘http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/coreutils/coreutils-8.25.tar.xz’: Couldn't resolve host name (6)
machine# builder for ‘/nix/store/5j3bc5sjr6271fnjh9gk9hrid8kgbpx3-coreutils-8.25.tar.xz.drv’ failed with exit code 1
machine# cannot build derivation ‘/nix/store/ybjgqwxx63l8cj1s7b8axx09wz06kxbv-coreutils-8.25.drv’: 1 dependencies couldn't be built
machine# error: build of ‘/nix/store/ybjgqwxx63l8cj1s7b8axx09wz06kxbv-coreutils-8.25.drv’ failed
````
Try to match the subcommands to act more like the subcommands from the
taskd binary and also add a subcommand to list groups.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
As suggested by @matthiasbeyer:
"We might add a short note that this port has to be opened in the
firewall, or is this done by the service automatically?"
This commit now adds the listenPort to
networking.firewall.allowedTCPPorts as soon as the listenHost is not
"localhost".
In addition to that, this is now also documented in the listenHost
option declaration and I have removed disabling of the firewall from the
VM test.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Whenever the nixos-taskserver tool was invoked manually for creating an
organisation/group/user we now add an empty file called .imperative to
the data directory.
During the preStart of the Taskserver service, we use process-json which
in turn now checks whether those .imperative files exist and if so, it
doesn't do anything with it.
This should now ensure that whenever there is a manually created user,
it doesn't get killed off by the declarative configuration in case it
shouldn't exist within that configuration.
In addition, we also add a small subtest to check whether this is
happening or not and fail if the imperatively created user got deleted
by process-json.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We were putting the whole output of "nixos-taskserver export-user" from
the server to the respective client and on every such operation the
whole output was shown again in the test log.
Now we're *only* showing these details whenever a user import fails on
the client.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Now we finally can delete organisations, groups and users along with
certificate revocation. The new subtests now make sure that the client
certificate is also revoked (both when removing the whole organisation
and just a single user).
If we use the imperative way to add and delete users, we have to restart
the Taskserver in order for the CRL to be effective.
However, by using the declarative configuration we now get this for
free, because removing a user will also restart the service and thus its
client certificate will end up in the CRL.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
It's not necessarily related to the PKI options, because this is also
used for setting the server address on the Taskwarrior client.
So if someone doesn't have his/her own certificates from another CA, all
options that need to be adjusted are in .pki. And if someone doesn't
want to bother with getting certificates from another CA, (s)he just
doesn't set anything in .pki.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
After moving out the PKI-unrelated options, let's name this a bit more
appropriate, so we can finally get rid of the taskserver.server thing.
This also moves taskserver.caCert to taskserver.pki.caCert, because that
clearly belongs to the PKI options.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Having an option called services.taskserver.server.host is quite
confusing because we already have "server" in the service name, so let's
first get rid of the listening options before we rename the rest of the
options in that .server attribute.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
As the nixos-taskserver command can also be used to imperatively manage
users, we need to test this as well.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This module adds an option `security.hideProcessInformation` that, when
enabled, restricts access to process information such as command-line
arguments to the process owner. The module adds a static group "proc"
whose members are exempt from process information hiding.
Ideally, this feature would be implemented by simply adding the
appropriate mount options to `fileSystems."/proc".fsOptions`, but this
was found to not work in vmtests. To ensure that process information
hiding is enforced, we use a systemd service unit that remounts `/proc`
after `systemd-remount-fs.service` has completed.
To verify the correctness of the feature, simple tests were added to
nixos/tests/misc: the test ensures that unprivileged users cannot see
process information owned by another user, while members of "proc" CAN.
Thanks to @abbradar for feedback and suggestions.
Using nixos-taskserver is more verbose but less cryptic and I think it
fits the purpose better because it can't be confused to be a wrapper
around the taskdctl command from the upstream project as
nixos-taskserver shares no commonalities with it.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
A small test which checks whether tasks can be synced using the
Taskserver.
It doesn't test group functionality because I suspect that they're not
yet implemented upstream. I haven't done an in-depth check on that but I
couldn't find a method of linking groups to users yet so I guess this
will get in with one of the text releases of Taskwarrior/Taskserver.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
