alioth/nixpkgs
3
0
Fork 0
forked from mirrors/nixpkgs
Code Releases Activity

doc/submitting-changes: should -> must

Browse source 
To me, as a native English speaker, this doesn't change the meaning of
the sentence at all.  But to a non-native speaker, this can read like
the staging-next rules are only recommendations.  Let's make this
clearer.
This commit is contained in:
Alyssa Ross 2021-05-23 15:31:09 +00:00
parent e438e6eb6b
commit dc3dea22be
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
doc/contributing/submitting-changes.chapter.md
View file

@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ The `staging` branch is a development branch where mass-rebuilds go. It should o
### Staging-next branch {#submitting-changes-staging-next-branch}
The `staging-next` branch is for stabilizing mass-rebuilds submitted to the `staging` branch prior to merging them into `master`. Mass-rebuilds should go via the `staging` branch. It should only see non-breaking commits that are fixing issues blocking it from being merged into the `master ` branch.
The `staging-next` branch is for stabilizing mass-rebuilds submitted to the `staging` branch prior to merging them into `master`. Mass-rebuilds must go via the `staging` branch. It must only see non-breaking commits that are fixing issues blocking it from being merged into the `master ` branch.
If the branch is already in a broken state, please refrain from adding extra new breakages. Stabilize it for a few days and then merge into master.