3
0
Fork 0
forked from mirrors/nixpkgs

lib/modules: fix error-message when declaring an option inside `config'

The message I originally implemented here was to catch a mixup of
`config' and `options' in a `types.submodule'[1]. However it looks
rather weird for a wrongly declared top-level option.

So I decided to throw

    error: The option `foo' does not exist. Definition values:
           - In `<unknown-file>':
               {
                 bar = {
                   _type = "option";
                   type = {
                     _type = "option-type";
               ...

           It seems as you're trying to declare an option by placing it into `config' rather than `options'!

for an expression like

    with import ./lib;

    evalModules {
      modules = [
        {
          foo.bar = mkOption {
            type = types.str;
          };
        }
      ];
    }

[1]  fa30c9abed
This commit is contained in:
Maximilian Bosch 2021-07-23 10:56:24 +02:00
parent fbc9084c39
commit b6d3c9f821
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 091DBF4D1FC46B8E

View file

@ -162,13 +162,24 @@ rec {
baseMsg = "The option `${showOption (prefix ++ firstDef.prefix)}' does not exist. Definition values:${showDefs [ firstDef ]}";
in
if attrNames options == [ "_module" ]
then throw ''
${baseMsg}
then
let
optionName = showOption prefix;
in
if optionName == ""
then throw ''
${baseMsg}
However there are no options defined in `${showOption prefix}'. Are you sure you've
declared your options properly? This can happen if you e.g. declared your options in `types.submodule'
under `config' rather than `options'.
''
It seems as you're trying to declare an option by placing it into `config' rather than `options'!
''
else
throw ''
${baseMsg}
However there are no options defined in `${showOption prefix}'. Are you sure you've
declared your options properly? This can happen if you e.g. declared your options in `types.submodule'
under `config' rather than `options'.
''
else throw baseMsg
else null;