3
0
Fork 0
forked from mirrors/nixpkgs

top-level: Allow nixpkgs to take localSystem directly

This is instead of both system and platform, which is kind of ugly.
This commit is contained in:
John Ericson 2017-02-08 16:43:52 -05:00
parent cd10e3c4ff
commit 8cd4c31d6b
4 changed files with 53 additions and 39 deletions

View file

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
<!--============================================================-->
<section xml:id="sec-cross-packaging">
<title>Packing in a cross-friendly manner</title>
<title>Packaging in a cross-friendly manner</title>
<section>
<title>Platform parameters</title>
@ -132,9 +132,23 @@
<section xml:id="sec-cross-usage">
<title>Cross-building packages</title>
<note><para>
More information needs to moved from the old wiki, especially <link xlink:href="https://nixos.org/wiki/CrossCompiling" />, for this section.
</para></note>
<para>
To be written.
This is basically unchanged so see the old wiki for now.
Many sources (manual, wiki, etc) probably mention passing <varname>system</varname>, <varname>platform</varname>, and, optionally, <varname>crossSystem</varname> to nixpkgs:
<literal>import &lt;nixpkgs&gt; { system = ..; platform = ..; crossSystem = ..; }</literal>.
<varname>system</varname> and <varname>platform</varname> together determine the system on which packages are built, and <varname>crossSystem</varname> specifies the platform on which packages are ultimately intended to run, if it is different.
This still works, but with more recent changes, one can alternatively pass <varname>localSystem</varname>, containing <varname>system</varname> and <varname>platform</varname>, for symmetry.
</para>
<para>
One would think that <varname>localSystem</varname> and <varname>crossSystem</varname> overlap horribly with the three <varname>*Platforms</varname> (<varname>buildPlatform</varname>, <varname>hostPlatform,</varname> and <varname>targetPlatform</varname>; see <varname>stage.nix</varname> or the manual).
Actually, those identifiers are purposefully not used here to draw a subtle but important distinction:
While the granularity of having 3 platforms is necessary to properly *build* packages, it is overkill for specifying the user's *intent* when making a build plan or package set.
A simple "build vs deploy" dichotomy is adequate: the sliding window principle described in the previous section shows how to interpolate between the these two "end points" to get the 3 platform triple for each bootstrapping stage.
That means for any package a given package set, even those not bound on the top level but only reachable via dependencies or <varname>buildPackages</varname>, the three platforms will be defined as one of <varname>localSystem</varname> or <varname>crossSystem</varname>, with the former replacing the latter as one traverses build-time dependencies.
A last simple difference then is <varname>crossSystem</varname> should be null when one doesn't want to cross-compile, while the <varname>*Platform</varname>s are always non-null.
<varname>localSystem</varname> is always non-null.
</para>
</section>

View file

@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ with pkgs;
# Override system. This is useful to build i686 packages on x86_64-linux.
forceSystem = system: kernel: nixpkgsFun {
inherit system;
platform = platform // { kernelArch = kernel; };
localSystem = {
inherit system;
platform = platform // { kernelArch = kernel; };
};
};
# Used by wine, firefox with debugging version of Flash, ...

View file

@ -17,8 +17,14 @@
evaluation is taking place, and the configuration from environment variables
or dot-files. */
{ # The system (e.g., `i686-linux') for which to build the packages.
system
{ # The system packages will be built on. See the manual for the
# subtle division of labor between these two `*System`s and the three
# `*Platform`s.
localSystem
# The system packages will ultimately be run on. Null if the two should be the
# same.
, crossSystem ? null
, # Allow a configuration attribute set to be passed in as an argument.
config ? {}
@ -27,12 +33,9 @@
overlays ? []
, # A function booting the final package set for a specific standard
# environment. See below for the arguments given to that function,
# the type of list it returns.
# environment. See below for the arguments given to that function, the type of
# list it returns.
stdenvStages ? import ../stdenv
, crossSystem ? null
, platform ? assert false; null
} @ args:
let # Rename the function arguments
@ -51,10 +54,10 @@ in let
# Allow setting the platform in the config file. Otherwise, let's use a
# reasonable default.
platform =
args.platform
or ( config.platform
or ((import ./platforms.nix).selectPlatformBySystem system) );
localSystem =
{ platform = (import ./platforms.nix).selectPlatformBySystem args.localSystem.system; }
// builtins.intersectAttrs { platform = null; } config
// args.localSystem;
# A few packages make a new package set to draw their dependencies from.
# (Currently to get a cross tool chain, or forced-i686 package.) Rather than
@ -71,7 +74,8 @@ in let
# To put this in concrete terms, this function is basically just used today to
# use package for a different platform for the current platform (namely cross
# compiling toolchains and 32-bit packages on x86_64). In both those cases we
# want the provided non-native `system` argument to affect the stdenv chosen.
# want the provided non-native `localSystem` argument to affect the stdenv
# chosen.
nixpkgsFun = newArgs: import ./. (args // newArgs);
# Partially apply some arguments for building bootstraping stage pkgs
@ -83,24 +87,7 @@ in let
boot = import ../stdenv/booter.nix { inherit lib allPackages; };
stages = stdenvStages {
# One would think that `localSystem` and `crossSystem` overlap horribly with
# the three `*Platforms` (`buildPlatform`, `hostPlatform,` and
# `targetPlatform`; see `stage.nix` or the manual). Actually, those
# identifiers I, @Ericson2314, purposefully not used here to draw a subtle
# but important distinction:
#
# While the granularity of having 3 platforms is necessary to properly
# *build* packages, it is overkill for specifying the user's *intent* when
# making a build plan or package set. A simple "build vs deploy" dichotomy
# is adequate: the "sliding window" principle described in the manual shows
# how to interpolate between the these two "end points" to get the 3
# platform triple for each bootstrapping stage.
#
# Also, less philosophically but quite practically, `crossSystem` should be
# null when one doesn't want to cross-compile, while the `*Platform`s are
# always non-null. `localSystem` is always non-null.
localSystem = { inherit system platform; };
inherit lib crossSystem config overlays;
inherit lib localSystem crossSystem config overlays;
};
pkgs = boot stages;

View file

@ -12,9 +12,11 @@ let
in
{ # Fallback: Assume we are building packages for the current (host, in GNU
# Autotools parlance) system.
system ? builtins.currentSystem
{ # We combine legacy `system` and `platform` into `localSystem`, if
# `localSystem` was not passed. Strictly speaking, this is pure desugar, but
# it is most convient to do so before the impure `localSystem.system` default,
# so we do it now.
localSystem ? builtins.intersectAttrs { system = null; platform = null; } args
, # Fallback: The contents of the configuration file found at $NIXPKGS_CONFIG or
# $HOME/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix.
@ -49,4 +51,13 @@ in
, ...
} @ args:
import ./. (args // { inherit system config overlays; })
# If `localSystem` was explicitly passed, legacy `system` and `platform` should
# not be passed.
assert args ? localSystem -> !(args ? system || args ? platform);
import ./. (builtins.removeAttrs args [ "system" "platform" ] // {
inherit config overlays;
# Fallback: Assume we are building packages on the current (build, in GNU
# Autotools parlance) system.
localSystem = { system = builtins.currentSystem; } // localSystem;
})